overall
57
96
style
Brewed by Belhaven (Greene King)
Style: Bitter
Dunbar, East Lothian, Scotland
Serve in English pint

bottled
available

on tap
available

Broad Distribution

Add Distribution Data
RATINGS: 1335   WEIGHTED AVG: 3.25/5   IBU: 25   EST. CALORIES: 117   ABV: 3.9%
COMMERCIAL DESCRIPTION
Available filtered and pasteurised in 500ml bottles, nitro-cans (as Draught), and in kegs; usually nitro-kegs.
Also known as Export.
The cask version is known as 80/-.
Note: It appears there are two versions of this beer - 5.2% primarily for the US market and 3.9% mainly for Europe.

Tick this beer for your profile
  • Currently 0/5 Stars.
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5


4.2
amx1970390 (480) - Southampton, Pennsylvania, USA - JUN 1, 2002
Great beer! Especially when from a nitrogen tap in a pub. Great creamy head, extremely smooth, well balanced. The next time you see this, try it instead of a guiness.

0.9
Bolt (117) - Boulder Creek, California, USA - MAY 25, 2002
Horrible... heavy vinegar taste. After reading all the other reviews, I hope it was just a bad keg at the local pub.

3.7
tourette (225) - Seattle, Washington, USA - MAY 24, 2002
Solid, well balanced ale. It has a nutty characteristic that I liked. Its full bodied and generally very good.

4
joeprogressive99 (6) - USA - MAY 20, 2002 does not count
This brew has strong caramel flavor with a hint of mocha. Finishes well but lacks kick. Overall an enjoyable beer that compliments most food very well.

3.6
Steak (124) - New York, USA - MAY 17, 2002
Such a nice dark reddy-brown color. The aroma was not very strong but their was a definite butterscotch aroma. The butterscotch was noted in the taste as well alongside a big malty feel. The beer was very, very thin towards the finish and I had thought that it would be much thicker, oh well. The finish seemed somewhat watered down and filtered and that as a dissapointment. It’s still good, but it has some things to work on.

3.5
Svartalf99 (4) - USA - MAY 13, 2002 does not count
Typical Nitrogen charged widget can of beer. It’s okay as a Scottish beer (it’s a little low flavor-wise for that...) and is definitely better than many of the offerings made in the States (Well, I will admit that it’s not at all hard to do that!). For the person wanting to try something a little different it’s worth the effort and I’d buy it again (but it’s lower on my list- I’m still going about trying new beers... Got a Zhiguly and a few others to give a whirl yet... :-)

2.5
mutant (854) - Melbourne, AUSTRALIA - MAY 11, 2002
Winey aroma & chestnut colour. Slight nutty flavour, not bitter but watery. Good session beer but too light for me.

3.3
CourageBest (51) - Katy, Texas, USA - MAY 3, 2002
Nice beer, a lot like Caffrey’s or John Smith’s in a can. While it is a little bit weak, it’s still tasty. Nice to linger over a can or two during a movie or a ballgame.

2.7
Drew (2411) - Kent, Ohio, USA - APR 30, 2002
slightly thicker and a little more flavorful than boddingtons. More on the sweet malt side, low hops. Very thin finnish as with most widgets.

3
bluemeow76 (693) - Lewis Center, Ohio, USA - APR 22, 2002
Nice creamy head - good color - but nothing great about this beer.


We Want To Hear From You



Join us! RateBeer is made by beer enthusiasts for the craft beer community. Your basic membership is free and allows you to read all beer ratings. Click here to create your account... and give your opinion!

Join Us »



Page  1 « 124 125 126  127  128 129 130 » 134
Tick this beer for your profile
  • Currently 0/5 Stars.
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5