overall
n/a
1
style
RATINGS: 3033   WEIGHTED AVG: 1.21/5   EST. CALORIES: 123   ABV: 4.1%
COMMERCIAL DESCRIPTION
Introduced nationally in 1982, Bud Light is brewed with a malt and hops ratio different from Budweiser for a distinctively crisp taste with fewer calories.

Tick this beer for your profile
  • Currently 0/5 Stars.
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5


3.6
   AROMA 6/10   APPEARANCE 4/5   TASTE 7/10   PALATE 4/5   OVERALL 15/20
Slimshadow1344 (18) - USA - JAN 23, 2002
A decent beer, stronger then coors light but still a little watery, decent tasting and a great party beer. Good to use for all occasions.

0.5
   AROMA 1/10   APPEARANCE 1/5   TASTE 1/10   PALATE 1/5   OVERALL 1/20
homebrewer799 (12) - Roslindale, Massachusetts, USA - JAN 21, 2002
Even piss has more body than this beer. Given the choice, Ill take the piss.

4.4
   AROMA 6/10   APPEARANCE 4/5   TASTE 10/10   PALATE 4/5   OVERALL 20/20
24oz99 (1) - Boscobel, Wisconsin, USA - JAN 19, 2002 does not count
This beer is the bomb! Love the taste, but not the aftermath!!!

4.1
   AROMA 4/10   APPEARANCE 4/5   TASTE 10/10   PALATE 3/5   OVERALL 20/20
eabearce99 (2) - Wisconsin, USA - JAN 19, 2002 does not count
I love it!! The taste is great, and I can drink alot of it!!

0.5
   AROMA 1/10   APPEARANCE 1/5   TASTE 1/10   PALATE 1/5   OVERALL 1/20
Kenvinbrew99 (3) - Tempe, Arizona, USA - JAN 16, 2002 does not count
Is this beer or water? Cant tell the difference.

0.7
   AROMA 2/10   APPEARANCE 1/5   TASTE 1/10   PALATE 1/5   OVERALL 2/20
666seth (229) - California, USA - JAN 15, 2002
This is even worse as its bud regular I dont know what they mean with premium? Compared to water maybe. If you want to save you some money go ahead and buy water.

1.1
   AROMA 2/10   APPEARANCE 2/5   TASTE 3/10   PALATE 1/5   OVERALL 3/20
turtlehead (111) - Nottingham, New Hampshire, USA - JAN 14, 2002
What can you say.

4.3
   AROMA 8/10   APPEARANCE 4/5   TASTE 9/10   PALATE 4/5   OVERALL 18/20
markymark (82) - Duluth, Minnesota, USA - JAN 14, 2002
Like most of the people say, good for a LIGHT beer.....I like it probably better than Budweiser, too.....

1.8
   AROMA 3/10   APPEARANCE 3/5   TASTE 2/10   PALATE 2/5   OVERALL 8/20
blaker24099 (5) - Ballwin, Missouri, USA - JAN 14, 2002 does not count
Not a bad beer...if youre trying to keep your figure. Not much taste but not bad. For a light beer its not bad

1.2
   AROMA 3/10   APPEARANCE 3/5   TASTE 1/10   PALATE 3/5   OVERALL 2/20
joet (2600) - Wilsonville, California, USA - JAN 12, 2002
UPDATED: OCT 30, 2008 Drinkable, wet, very mild to non-existent aroma when served very chilled in the bottle as recommended. gryhdfghdfghfghfdghdfghdh


We Want To Hear From You



Join us! RateBeer is made by beer enthusiasts for the craft beer community. Your basic membership is free and allows you to read all beer ratings. Click here to create your account... and give your opinion!

Join Us »



Page  1 « 284 285 286  287  288 289 290 » 304
Tick this beer for your profile
  • Currently 0/5 Stars.
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5