overall
n/a
1
style
RATINGS: 2729   WEIGHTED AVG: 1.22/5   EST. CALORIES: 126   ABV: 4.2%
COMMERCIAL DESCRIPTION
Introduced nationally in 1982, Bud Light is brewed with a malt and hops ratio different from Budweiser for a distinctively crisp taste with fewer calories.

A tick is a star rating
  • Currently 0/5 Stars.
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5


poolshark99's rating

3
   AROMA 4/10   APPEARANCE 3/5   TASTE 7/10   PALATE 3/5   OVERALL 13/20
poolshark99 (10) - Garden CIty, New York, USA - DEC 16, 2002
NOt a bad beer. I've had better but this is the only budweiser i really like. It beats natty ice but unfortunately its a little more expensive=<


0.7
ads135 (5213) - Omaha, Nebraska, USA - JAN 13, 2018
Not much to this beer. Thin and yellow. Effervescent and a sweet. Tried for the first time in 2007.

1.5
browarpapi (256) - WrocÅ‚aw, POLAND - JAN 13, 2018
UPDATED: JAN 13, 2018 Piwo o jasno żółtej barwie, piana słaba bez lacingu. W smaku i zapachu zwykły jasny międzynarodowy lager.

1.2
drjay44 (3892) - Salida, Colorado, USA - JAN 8, 2018
24 oz. can. Pours a thin, poorly retained off white head, with no lacing, over a clear light yellow (SRM 2) body.....nose is mild malts, minimal hops, balanced......taste is light malt tones, finishing with hints of hop spice and bitterness......mouth feel, watery body, no alcohol, moderate carbonation. This is closer to being carbonated water than a beer. BJCP 4/1/9/3/4

1.6
swapp (412) - Kaunas, LITHUANIA - DEC 22, 2017
UPDATED: DEC 22, 2017 440 ml can. 3,5% UK version. clear pale yellow color almost with no head. smells some corn and barley malts. taste are simple water and some notes of barley and corn. no aftertaste. very commercial beer. some vater drinks with small taste of beer.

3.6
rallyej25 (2) - - DEC 20, 2017 does not count
UPDATED: DEC 20, 2017 You get what you pay for. Cheap and drinkable. Not the best beer ever but it’s cheap and gets the job done.

3.8
seanleach469 (2) - - DEC 17, 2017 does not count
This is my go to beer when drinking it’s smooth and doesn’t bloat you like some other beers do. The taste is good but keep in mind this is not a craft beer ---Rated via Beer Buddy for iPhone

1.3
czlowiekwiadro (1238) - POLAND - DEC 3, 2017
zapach bardzo delikatny, lekko kwaśny, trochę kurzu, skórek i ogonków z jabłek i odrobina słodów gdzieś w tle. kolor złoty, jasny, w toni pływają bardzo niewielkie drobiny. piana biała, skąpa, nietrwała. w smaku woda z odrobiną słodów, kukurydzy i jabłka, sporo kurzu i piwnicy. goryczki brak. nasycenie umiarkowane

0.6
BeerBenji (22) - - DEC 2, 2017
One of the worst beers in my opinion. Easy to drink, just a cheap watered down can of garbage. ---Rated via Beer Buddy for iPhone

0.6
lokis333 (619) - Biržai, LITHUANIA - NOV 26, 2017
*UK version at 3.5%* Clear very light well-hydrated urine colour with medium very weak white foam. Aromas slightly sweet of banana peel, slight grassy hops and metallic water. Very plain. Palate, light watery body with fizzy watery body leaving metallic finish. Taste, watery metallic maybe notes of stale biscuits that have been left open on a shelf for over 7 years. Overall, well what can you know... Thought it might have something but just stale water...

0.6
beerluvr44 (2) - Louisiana, USA - NOV 24, 2017 does not count
One of the worst beers ive ever tasted. It is basically wet flour in a can. Not sure why it is so damn popular... maybe just marketed well?


We Want To Hear From You



Join us! RateBeer is made by beer enthusiasts for the craft beer community. Your basic membership is free and allows you to read all beer ratings. Click here to create your account... and give your opinion!

Join Us »



Page    1  2 3 4 » 310
A tick is a star rating
  • Currently 0/5 Stars.
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5