hoppers (3) - AUSTRALIA - OCT 13, 2005 does not count
3.4 AROMA 7/10 APPEARANCE 3/5 TASTE 7/10 PALATE 3/5 OVERALL 14/20
Sampled this fine nectar from the gods 7/10/05. Pleasant aroma but not over powering. The golden colour looks very enticing. This crisp easy drinking drop dosent leave you dissappointed. A bit dry afterwards, but still go back for more.
roadracer (2) - CANADA - OCT 10, 2005 does not count
1.5 AROMA 2/10 APPEARANCE 3/5 TASTE 4/10 PALATE 3/5 OVERALL 3/20
Agree with most, this is thin and dry. Mine purchased in Canada had a different label without Budweiser branding. Simply labelled ’Czechvar’ in same design as sample here. Cheap price, I got what I paid for.
beerbill (3615) - Laurel, New York, USA - OCT 2, 2005
3.2 AROMA 6/10 APPEARANCE 4/5 TASTE 7/10 PALATE 3/5 OVERALL 12/20
Bottle. Pours a pale golden with a whispy white head. Heavily carbonated. Light sweet aroma. Taste is crisp and dry, with a little sweetness. Slightly bitter aftertaste. MUCH better than its American namesake.
porterhouse (1580) - Boothbay, Maine, USA - SEP 30, 2005
2.4 AROMA 5/10 APPEARANCE 3/5 TASTE 4/10 PALATE 2/5 OVERALL 10/20
(Bottle, best before 1/06) White head, pale yellow body. Slight lacing. Aroma faint honey. Taste a little doughy, otherwise pretty bland. Dry mouthfeel.
hershiser2 (2591) - Charlottesville, Virginia, USA - SEP 29, 2005
3.1 AROMA 6/10 APPEARANCE 3/5 TASTE 6/10 PALATE 3/5 OVERALL 13/20
Gold with a small head. Lotsa bubbles. Smells of grasses and light malts. Taste isn’t bad, surprisingly. It’s grassy, but crisp and drinkable, rather than being bland and ordinary. Now, I wouldn’t drink this on a regular basis, but if I HAD to, I wouldn’t mind (too much).
yalnikim (800) - Wellington, NEW ZEALAND - SEP 28, 2005
2.5 AROMA 5/10 APPEARANCE 3/5 TASTE 5/10 PALATE 2/5 OVERALL 10/20
Tasted 28/09/2005. 330ml bottle at Cellar-Vate tasting.
Snappily dressed in green, embossed, bottle and frilly label. Not much going for it after that. Thin, pale gold, a little stale and quite watery. Hints at some nice juicy, honey-like, malt and lemony, zingy, hops but they are almost undetectable. Would love to gve it another go fresh. I never even tried it in the Czech Republic.
rederic (3307) - montréal, Quebec, CANADA - SEP 27, 2005
3.4 AROMA 6/10 APPEARANCE 3/5 TASTE 7/10 PALATE 4/5 OVERALL 14/20
Bright golden honey hue, with soft foamy white head, with pale malt, toasty malt, floral hops aromas follow through on a medium-bodied palate with a crisp pale malt, fruity note, floral hops, leading towards a smooth maltiness finish.
Fukito (1031) - Santiago, CHILE - SEP 25, 2005
3.1 AROMA 6/10 APPEARANCE 3/5 TASTE 7/10 PALATE 3/5 OVERALL 12/20
500 cm3 Can - September 05
Pours pale golden colour with a nice white head. Aroma is flowery and sutile. Taste is somewhat sweet and slightly bitter at the end. Overall a nice Pilsner, but i prefer PU for a more intensive experience.
Quinten (1062) - zaandam, NETHERLANDS - SEP 22, 2005
4.1 AROMA 9/10 APPEARANCE 4/5 TASTE 8/10 PALATE 3/5 OVERALL 17/20
15 years ago, the pilsener urquel was the only one fore me from czech beer, but now with 4 other czech pilsener budweiser budvar is one of the best.
Magjayran (1378) - Durham, North Carolina, USA - SEP 20, 2005
2.4 AROMA 5/10 APPEARANCE 2/5 TASTE 5/10 PALATE 2/5 OVERALL 10/20
Pours a yellow color with a decent size that goes away quickly. Sweet malt in the aroma but really not much going on. Flavor is lightly malty with just a hint of hops. Watery finish. Doesn’t really do much for me.