overall
0
2
style
RATINGS: 874   WEIGHTED AVG: 1.4/5   EST. CALORIES: 129   ABV: 4.3%
COMMERCIAL DESCRIPTION
American-style lager that is long brewed for a crisp taste that finishes clean. It contains only 99 calories, 3.1 grams of carbohydrates and 4.3 percent alcohol by volume per 12 oz. serving.

Tick this beer for your profile
  • Currently 0/5 Stars.
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5


1.2
   AROMA 2/10   APPEARANCE 2/5   TASTE 2/10   PALATE 2/5   OVERALL 4/20
Skrip99 (82) - Los Angeles, California, USA - MAR 3, 2005
Wow, Buds answer to Michelobs successful Ultra. If you are a healthnut or are watching youre calories, then now you have another choice besides Ultra & Aspen. But I find of the three, this is the worst.

0.7
   AROMA 1/10   APPEARANCE 2/5   TASTE 1/10   PALATE 1/5   OVERALL 2/20
Cornfield (5570) - Oak Forest, Illinois, USA - MAR 2, 2005
I dont see the point to A-B making this "beer." Its just Buds weakest sister. Ugly urine yellow with a sweaty armpit stench, this has a sweet corn flavor and is virtually hopless. And hopeless. At least the sweet metallic finish is pretty weak.

1.5
   AROMA 3/10   APPEARANCE 2/5   TASTE 3/10   PALATE 3/5   OVERALL 4/20
BuckNaked (1230) - Ann Arbor, Michigan, USA - MAR 2, 2005
Bottle: Thanks to the locals at the Grey Lodge for sending this one over as a joke....guess they thought I wouldnt rate it. Pours like water with pale yellow food coloring. Aroma is mild grass (hops!). Flavor is sweet grains, corn, light hops. Quite honestly this was better than I expected, and you really can get just a hint of hops here.

1.3
   AROMA 2/10   APPEARANCE 2/5   TASTE 2/10   PALATE 2/5   OVERALL 5/20
changxao (104) - South Carolina, USA - MAR 1, 2005
I didnt know what this was when I bought it, but when I drank it, I thought, "hmmm bud light light". Now it is apparent that this is competition to Miller Lite. Not much to say, just thin, carbonated, and light in color and flavor. Drinkable, just not too good.

0.9
   AROMA 2/10   APPEARANCE 1/5   TASTE 2/10   PALATE 1/5   OVERALL 3/20
crzybob77 (530) - Richmond, Virginia, USA - MAR 1, 2005
Hard to describe something with no flavor to rate. I guess this is their competition with miller lite.

1.2
   AROMA 3/10   APPEARANCE 2/5   TASTE 2/10   PALATE 1/5   OVERALL 4/20
Slick (1969) - Thief River Falls, Minnesota, USA - MAR 1, 2005
Decent pale golden color,small white head that faded quickly leaving little behind.The aroma was faintly malty with a bit of hops in the background,and fairly decently carbonated.The taste was another thing all together.Watery thin malt some adjuncts and just a very faint hint of hops in the end and the only thing really happening in this beer is the Carbonation which helps the beer keep going but to where i no not.if you can find a single of this its worth trying atleast once but if you have to buy more then that id wait until someone else buys it then mooch one off of them.

1.1
   AROMA 2/10   APPEARANCE 2/5   TASTE 3/10   PALATE 1/5   OVERALL 3/20
wilkie (1208) - Raleigh, North Carolina, USA - MAR 1, 2005
Bottle. What a fucking joke. Is this Buds attempt at the South beach beer drinker? Pale, tasteless, and Just downright nasty. I thought it was just a new marketing scheme for bud until I asked a friend. Pisses me off.

0.8
   AROMA 2/10   APPEARANCE 1/5   TASTE 1/10   PALATE 2/5   OVERALL 2/20
BckDich (5464) - McCall, Idaho, USA - FEB 28, 2005
I could try to think up something witty about this to describe it but its really not even worth it. Its watery, pale and full of rice nose and flavor, less of a finish than drinking water. The rice is all that jumps up. If it werent for the carbonation and the watery finish Id think this was watered down geikkekan.

1
   AROMA 2/10   APPEARANCE 2/5   TASTE 2/10   PALATE 2/5   OVERALL 2/20
hopdog (11888) - Lansdale, Pennsylvania, USA - FEB 28, 2005
UPDATED: MAR 1, 2005 After drinking and writing notes on 24 beers (hit up the Sly Fox then Victory then the Philly Gathering), what better way than to end it with this? Very weak aromas and tastes. Lightly sweet. Watery body.

1.1
   AROMA 2/10   APPEARANCE 1/5   TASTE 2/10   PALATE 1/5   OVERALL 5/20
JFGrind (2019) - Glenside, Pennsylvania, USA - FEB 28, 2005
One of the regulars at my local watering hole works for a Budweiser distributor. He was given a free six pack and brought it down the bar for light beer drinkers to sample. Two weeks later there was still two bottles left. Nobody wanted to try it. Not even for free. Popping the cap the beer gave off the aroma of a wet rag. Slight lacing of the glass during the sample. Chemical taste and a sweet finish. Id rather have a cider or even a B to the E over Bud Select.


We Want To Hear From You



Join us! RateBeer is made by beer enthusiasts for the craft beer community. Your basic membership is free and allows you to read all beer ratings. Click here to create your account... and give your opinion!

Join Us »



Page  1 « 82 83 84  85  86 87 88
Tick this beer for your profile
  • Currently 0/5 Stars.
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5