goatmanstevo (16) - Houghton, USA - JAN 10, 2003
Well.. it is a bud.. but i like the light better!!! elsberry (87) - North Carolina, USA - JAN 10, 2003
Slightly better than spoiled milk, with better color... Crap. I’ve had medicine that was better. Terribly nasty aftertaste. I would rather not drink, than drink this beer. BeerManDan (21) - Houghton, Michigan, USA - JAN 9, 2003
A noticeably ricy taste, other than tha a run of the mill beer that sells a butt load.
Orlan (25) - AUSTRALIA - JAN 9, 2003
Worlds best selling beer - Amazing what marketing can do hey? xmandax (130) - Astoria, New York, USA - JAN 8, 2003
this is crap. it’s better than a forty, but it’s weak, thin, and lame. it will get you drunk (eventually) and that’s the best i can say for this "beer."
vector (163) - Dallas, Texas, USA - JAN 7, 2003
UPDATED: MAY 21, 2003 Pretty typical American standard fizzy lager but better than MGD, Coors, or other crowd-pleasing American macros. Also better than almost anything with 'Malt' or 'light' in the label (yes, I know of exceptions, too). Still, spend a couple bucks more and get something decent. Certainly not the 'king of beers' no matter how much it sells. zoomer6999 (20) - winnipeg, Manitoba, CANADA - JAN 2, 2003
Budweiser is the best damn beer in Canada.I have tried it in the U.S. before and it is way different,the taste and everything about it isn’t as good.You drink one and good luck stopping cause it makes you want more.Bud=#1 tigre38699 (20) - austin, Texas, USA - JAN 1, 2003
hardly even good for that bebop99 (15) - austin, Texas, USA - JAN 1, 2003
good for new years and sitting on the roof Linc (739) - Sydney, AUSTRALIA - DEC 31, 2002
From all the bad press I had expected worse. This is just an extremely average pale lager, no surprises.