overall
0
3
style
RATINGS: 4039   WEIGHTED AVG: 1.46/5   EST. CALORIES: 150   ABV: 5%
COMMERCIAL DESCRIPTION
Brewed and sold since 1876, "The King of Beers" is the largest-selling beer in the world. Budweiser has been the worlds best-selling beer since 1957, and is distributed in more than 70 countries. Budweiser leads the U.S. Premium beer category, outselling all other domestic premium beers combined. In fact, one in almost every five beers sold in the United States today is a Budweiser.
"We know of no brand produced by any other brewer which costs so much to brew and age. Our exclusive Beechwood Aging produces a taste, a smoothness and a drinkability you will find in no other beer at any price."
"Brewed with 100% natural ingredients. We use only the finest hops, barley malt, rice, yeast and water. We craft and age Budweiser using time-honoured brewing methods."

Tick this beer for your profile
  • Currently 0/5 Stars.
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5


0.8
   AROMA 1/10   APPEARANCE 1/5   TASTE 2/10   PALATE 1/5   OVERALL 3/20
Volgon (2763) - Manchester, New Hampshire, USA - SEP 20, 2002
UPDATED: JAN 7, 2004 Re-rate 5/8/02: Born on date 5/8/02, that's right I drank a bottle on the day that it was bottled. It sure changed my opinion. The little nasty cardboard/skunk flavor that often is present in a two-month old Bud is nowhere to be found. Even the rice characteristic was better. I bet that there isn't more than 20,000 beers on the planet better than this. First rating: It's crap. It's hard to do worse. If you just want to get messed up, get a big ABV 40OZ malt liquor and go nuts, but don't drink this!

1.6
   AROMA 3/10   APPEARANCE 1/5   TASTE 4/10   PALATE 2/5   OVERALL 6/20
Radek Kliber (7239) - Toronto (Can) Krotoszyn (Pol), POLAND - SEP 20, 2002
UPDATED: DEC 22, 2008 I just had today at my friend b-day. They Bottle 341 ml, Appearance: very pale, one of the lightest brews I had in long time. Light fizzy top with frisk carbonation.1+ Aroma: very light grainy, grassy notes with light sourness. 3- Flavor/Palate: medium light bodied. Slightly more character than you will see in average macro pale lager. Sweet biscuit feel with shallow ending. Thin hop scent on top.

1.4
   AROMA 3/10   APPEARANCE 1/5   TASTE 3/10   PALATE 1/5   OVERALL 6/20
AleConnoisseur (29) - Houghton, Michigan, USA - SEP 20, 2002
This beer is better than most in the same price range, how ever this certainly is not a great beer.

0.5
   AROMA 1/10   APPEARANCE 1/5   TASTE 1/10   PALATE 1/5   OVERALL 1/20
Valheru (17) - CZECH REPUBLIC - SEP 17, 2002
The only thing good about this beer is its name... but check out Budweiser Budvar to understand what the beer of this name SHOULD taste.

1.2
   AROMA 1/10   APPEARANCE 2/5   TASTE 1/10   PALATE 3/5   OVERALL 5/20
beerguy101 (5360) - Newark, California, USA - SEP 16, 2002
Bud is Bud. It IS an amazing fact that they can brew so much of this stuff and it always tastes the same. Lots of better beers and lots of beers that are worse. Lt gold color, large head. Lt flavor, no maltyness, some hoppyness. Pilsner Style beer, but very light flavor. Neutral mouthfeel, some hoppyness on tongue. Finish is crisp and clean. Aftertaste is neutral, slightly bitter.

0.6
   AROMA 1/10   APPEARANCE 1/5   TASTE 1/10   PALATE 1/5   OVERALL 2/20
hayden1215 (319) - Ohio, USA - SEP 16, 2002
One crappy beer. I cant believe 1 in 5 beers sold in the US is this crap. Its not even that cheap. I guess your paying for the advertising not the beer.

0.5
   AROMA 1/10   APPEARANCE 1/5   TASTE 1/10   PALATE 1/5   OVERALL 1/20
getsomeplaya99 (19) - Waukegan, Illinois, USA - SEP 14, 2002
Hmm.. rice beer??? Those people on the other side of the river are a little off. Once again if it wasnt brewed in Milwaukee its not worth drinking

0.5
   AROMA 1/10   APPEARANCE 1/5   TASTE 1/10   PALATE 1/5   OVERALL 1/20
gthank (73) - Atlanta, Georgia, USA - SEP 13, 2002
Piss in a can (dont waste your money on the bottles).

3.8
   AROMA 7/10   APPEARANCE 5/5   TASTE 7/10   PALATE 4/5   OVERALL 15/20
BeermanLayton (33) - Rohnert Park, California, USA - SEP 12, 2002
Not quite the "King of Beers" but a good one.

1
   AROMA 1/10   APPEARANCE 1/5   TASTE 3/10   PALATE 1/5   OVERALL 4/20
Aesir (130) - Tustin, California, USA - SEP 11, 2002
UPDATED: DEC 15, 2003 Very fizzy, very flavorless. If your name was BUD, you'd be WEISER to choose another beer.....AHAHAHAHAHAAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAH


We Want To Hear From You



Join us! RateBeer is made by beer enthusiasts for the craft beer community. Your basic membership is free and allows you to read all beer ratings. Click here to create your account... and give your opinion!

Join Us »



Page  1 « 338 339 340  341  342 343 344 » 404
Tick this beer for your profile
  • Currently 0/5 Stars.
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5