hoorayforbeer (105) - Denton, Texas, USA - NOV 2, 2002
On tap with someone else buying... It didn’t taste bad per se, it was just indistinguishible from water. victorious99 (13) - Milwaukee, Wisconsin, USA - NOV 1, 2002
Looks like a soda can. If this is the King of Beers, this is a VERY sad world. Better than Bud Light, but that doesn’t take much. Treehugger (8) - Salida, Colorado, USA - OCT 31, 2002 does not count
King of Advertising. It’s a shame that many people think this is the best beer America has to offer. Rhino (57) - USA - OCT 31, 2002
Not a bad beer. To bad people in England drink it tho. jedimasternick (96) - Tucson, Arizona, USA - OCT 29, 2002
UPDATED: APR 9, 2003 Budweiser is like a cheap date, you want a good time for the least amount of money (and effort). It is the king of sales, and until the micro brews team up in a world organization of small brewers(good luck), companies like Bud will remain numero uno.
freekyp (2235) - Thomasville, North Carolina, USA - OCT 29, 2002
UPDATED: SEP 22, 2006 SHMEDLEY BEER TASTING 09-16-2006 The best thing I can say is it is wet. Really, I would take water over this, but in the name of ratings... Straw colored with a weak fizzy head that went down faster than college freshman. At least there were no prominent off aromas. puc86 (19) - USA - OCT 26, 2002
Big bubbles, no hops, lots of rice, almost tastes like beer. faulstich (25) - Davis, California, USA - OCT 22, 2002
Why is it that the worst score you can give is 0.5? Because I’d like to give this a 0.5, but there are, unbelievable, worse beers out there. Oh, well, I guess I’ll be generous just to rank it accordingly. kilnari99 (8) - Virginia, USA - OCT 22, 2002 does not count
the staple of beers. has been and always will be my king of beers. Void42599 (5) - USA - OCT 22, 2002 does not count
This is Bad, But it deserves a couple higher ratings then Keystone.