Rasmus40 (22130) - Beder, Aarhus, DENMARK - FEB 1, 2011
Clear pale yellow with a small white head. Aroma is light malty. Flavor is light sweet and no bitterness. Soft, light bodied and very watery. By no means a good beer but not as bad as it’s reputation. It seems like a bit of a sport on this site to give a 0.5 score to Budweiser, but I have certainly had worse beers. 191210 Koelschtrinker (22074) - KÃ¶ln (Cologne), GERMANY - APR 17, 2005
In Germany you get this beer under the name "Anheuser Busch Bud". The biggest brewery in the world. Why? In Germany nobody likes beer from the USA because its mostly like water - like this one. Who drinks such a "beer"? This brewery brews as much as all german brewerys together! But they really don’t know how to make a good beer. Armselig. fiulijn (21511) - Vancouver, British Columbia, CANADA - MAY 19, 2003
KegTheydon_Bois (21466) - Hazlemere, the lower Xhitlerns, Buckinghamshire, ENGLAND - DEC 31, 2012
Ok, I had it! Well, it's not the worst one; light malty aroma, some body, light sweetness. The final is really watery. I hope I will wait again 10 years before drinking it again, but at least I was not disgusted.
Bottle at the RHCC, last rate of 2012 - 31/12/12.
Clear pale golden with a whin white head that clears to the edge and forms a swirl of a film.
Nose is pale malt, grain, very little on offer to the nasal passage !!!
Taste comprises pale malts, very faint caramel, barley, artificial sugar thing lurking in the background, grain.
Thin and watery in body, fizzy, dry and spritzy in the finish.
Best thing I did with this having gleaned the rating essentials was to pour more than half the glass down the sink behind the bar, then top it right up with R Whites lemonade and a few ice cubes - a distinct improvement! mcberko (19837) - Vancouver, British Columbia, CANADA - OCT 14, 2009
Absolutely horrid. Tastes like someone urinated in a bottle and then carbonated it. Not even remotely drinkable.
saxo (19569) - Højbjerg, Aarhus, DENMARK - FEB 27, 2006
UPDATED: JAN 19, 2008 Canned. Medium head with short duration. Pale pale pale yellow- almost watery - and amazingly that is also the way it tastes :) . It is still decent tho. harrisoni (19535) - Ashford, Kent, ENGLAND - JUN 22, 2006
33cl bottle. Pale gold, lasting white head. I guess my major criticism of this beer would just be the lack of aroma and flavour. It is certainly not the worst mass produced lager I have drunk. Some pale malt and hop aroma. Light and fluffy in mouth with almost no flavour whatsoever. Bit of hop bite on end. Dull but inoffensive. Oakes (19409) - Vancouver, British Columbia, CANADA - JUN 25, 2000
UPDATED: JUN 27, 2005 Remarkably pale yellow, even for a macrobrew. Aroma of fusels and light acetaldehyde, plus some rotting vegetables. Ethereal body. Flavour, such as it is being completely overrun by a gross imbalance of water, leans towards wonderbread malts, fusel alcohol. That’s pretty much it. Finish has a fair bit of acidity. It’s not all that well carbonated, quite frankly, so I don’t see this as being carbonic acid. Could be ascorbic acid, a common macrobrew additive. At any rate, it’s just a hint in an otherwise tap watery finish. rlgk (18843) - Göteborg, SWEDEN - JUL 19, 2003
UPDATED: MAR 16, 2008 Pale yellow with a quickly disappearing head. Soft but also almost tasteless chrisv10 (18707) - DENMARK - AUG 18, 2010
50 cl can. Clear pale yellow with medium white head. Flavour is malt, corn and watery.