overall
n/a
0
style
RATINGS: 163   WEIGHTED AVG: 1.02/5   EST. CALORIES: 12   ABV: 0.4%
COMMERCIAL DESCRIPTION
Busch NA is a fully-fermented, non-alcohol version of Busch beer that offers a smooth, full-bodied, malty flavor. All of Anheuser-Busch’s non-alcohol products are brewed, fermented and aged to full maturity. The alcohol is then removed through the use of low-temperature, low-pressure distillation. This extremely gentle process allows the alcohol to be removed without heating or cooking the beer, which retains the full, rich and delicate flavor and balance of our non-alcohol brews.

Tick this beer for your profile
  • Currently 0/5 Stars.
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5


1.7
Slick (1969) - Thief River Falls, Minnesota, USA - JUN 22, 2003
I have a whole bunch of these NA beers and it's time to rate a few.I guess i'd have to say this one had a nice golden color,malty ,with a watery carbonated feel that left a mild after taste in the mouth that i can't say was real terrible,but then i grew up on NA beer since it was all my grandfather would bring on fishing trips.I wish they still made the brew called Near Beer now that was a decent NA

0.5
gjamieson (80) - Canton, Georgia, USA - MAR 30, 2003
Subpremium indeed. Why would you want a near-beer that tastes like a beer that tastes like shit? And what gets me is that it sells!

0.5
Shag (3027) - Chattanooga, Tennessee, USA - MAR 14, 2003
ha ha ha! Nothing like that shitty metallic taste with no alcohol, not the lowest rated beer on the site by accident, gag gag, if it tastes like crap please at least let it get you drunk, did I mention it sucks?

0.5
Shenzer (48) - Ontario, CANADA - MAR 6, 2003
this isn't a beer, its for kiddies who enjoy trowing cans at cars. dont bother wasting money of this crap

0.8
spicedad2 (78) - Huntingdon Valley, Pennsylvania, USA - JAN 16, 2003
This is not beer. It's beer flavored carbonated beverage................

0.6
UNCCTF (587) - Cary, North Carolina, USA - JAN 4, 2003
If Busch is crap, then this is crap concentrate.............................

0.5
FUNK (120) - Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA - NOV 7, 2002
What the Hells the point? ..........................................

0.5
Kevbo99 (149) - Dunmore, Pennsylvania, USA - OCT 23, 2002
stank in a can. pure swill even for recovering alcoholics...................

0.8
SmellGood (339) - Memphis, Tennessee, USA - OCT 19, 2002
I figured I would try this because it can't be worse than Busch. I was right. They are both .....BAD!

0.5
DankbrewedDank (162) - East Grand Rapids, Michigan, USA - OCT 10, 2002
?.................................................


We Want To Hear From You



Join us! RateBeer is made by beer enthusiasts for the craft beer community. Your basic membership is free and allows you to read all beer ratings. Click here to create your account... and give your opinion!

Join Us »



Page  1 « 12 13 14  15  16 17
Tick this beer for your profile
  • Currently 0/5 Stars.
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5