overall
n/a
0
style
RATINGS: 163   WEIGHTED AVG: 1.02/5   EST. CALORIES: 12   ABV: 0.4%
COMMERCIAL DESCRIPTION
Busch NA is a fully-fermented, non-alcohol version of Busch beer that offers a smooth, full-bodied, malty flavor. All of Anheuser-Busch’s non-alcohol products are brewed, fermented and aged to full maturity. The alcohol is then removed through the use of low-temperature, low-pressure distillation. This extremely gentle process allows the alcohol to be removed without heating or cooking the beer, which retains the full, rich and delicate flavor and balance of our non-alcohol brews.

A tick is a star rating
  • Currently 0/5 Stars.
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5


3.6
shaun8403 (1) - evansville, Indiana, USA - MAR 8, 2008 does not count
Its Non-alcoholic so its not as good as the real deal. But for those who cant handle the real deal and like the taste of beer (such as I) found it relatively good. While ice cold it had a nice crisp taste, aroma was good. For it being the "cheap stuff" its not the bad so suck it up you all.

2.8
SudsMcDuff (8494) - .....Manchester United.........., Texas, USA - JAN 8, 2011
Pours a light yellow, good foam for a NA .. . tastes just like a lighter version of busch light .. . i tricked Judy with it .. . as far as NA’s goes this is abit below average .. . how come when i wear basketball shorts, my butt starts smelling?

2.6
thedm (6319) - Fort Wayne, Indiana, USA - AUG 9, 2004
This canned brew poured a medium sized head of fine to medium sized white colored mostly lasting bubbles that left behind a transparent weakly carbonated weak yellow orange colored body. The aroma was mild and smooth with malt and dough like scents. The mouth feel was tingly and bubbly initially and lasted well into the finish. The flavor was surprisingly good for an NA and I even found myself drinking another with I would have never thought I’d do with an NA beer. It is much like a regular Busch beer. This is by far one of the better NA’s I have had.

2.6
LinusStick (3510) - Moon Twp, suburb of Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, USA - NOV 4, 2015
Not bad for a non alcoholic beer. Hard to rate this but it has a decent lager flavor. There’s a lot worse out there. Nice carbonation.

2.5
SpringsLicker (3677) - Tennessee, USA - MAY 23, 2009
Clear light gold with a tall frothy white head. Sweet corn aroma. Little flavor, some faint grainyness. Cold wet. As good as a good cold glass of water.

2.5
3fourths (9358) - Boulder, Colorado, USA - AUG 20, 2017
From can stamped 17199 (July 18, 2017). Light-bodied and nearly flavorless, neutral saccharine/toasted grain effects, and enjoyably frothy for its size. Surprisingly no fault or flaw, even as it warms. Like moderately bitter off-dry mineral water, faint corn syrup, almost a touch of plastic/malt liquor in the nose.

2.3
brentfeesh (1216) - Mansfield, Ohio, USA - FEB 7, 2008
Ummmmm. Rated for the “low Alcohol” tic mark only. Nothing wrong with the look. Golden, clear, and carbonated. The aroma is solid BMC light lager all the way. No real off aromas while cold. The flavor is not near as bad as I might have guessed and I think the <1 ratings are a bit harsh. What is wrong, exactally, with the palate and appearance?? It’s not like this thing has great flavors as it warms (and believe me, I did not let it warm that much) but while it’s ice cold it is relatively quenching light lager. Carbonated and watery body. Again, ice cold this was drinkable, but I still wonder why you would drink this??


We Want To Hear From You



Join us! RateBeer is made by beer enthusiasts for the craft beer community. Your basic membership is free and allows you to read all beer ratings. Click here to create your account... and give your opinion!

Join Us »



Page    1  2 3 4 » 17
A tick is a star rating
  • Currently 0/5 Stars.
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5