reebtogi (6267) - Edmonton, Alberta, CANADA - DEC 27, 2012 GodOfThunder (1249) - Orlando, Florida, USA - MAY 25, 2012
1.5 AROMA 3/10 APPEARANCE 2/5 TASTE 2/10 PALATE 3/5 OVERALL 5/20
It is pretty horrible. It tastes like a corn field that hasn’t been tended to in 8 years went and had sex with a cardboard box factory.
355ml bottle pours a golden color with a small white head that leaves some spotty lacing on the glass. Aroma is mild with some grains and grassy with a touch of citrus. Taste is a grainy malty sweetness with a grassy and slightly metallic bitterness with a touch of citrus. Just another typical macro lager. I would like to know what they consider a small batch. Not recommended. BeerHawk (1810) - Huntsville, Alabama, USA - JUL 7, 2012
Bottle, batch 73. Poured golden with a fizzy white head. Aroma of lemon and grain. Subdue blah lager flavor. Light body and crisp. Stldsf1 (616) - Florida, USA - JUN 7, 2012
Pours clear yellow. Scents of... Nothing. Taste of yeast and rusty bread maybe? Who knows what that is. Water is really what it tastes like
---Rated via Beer Buddy for iPhone UnholyBrewing (595) - Central Florida(Upper Hell), Florida, USA - MAY 22, 2012
...well, it’s better than most regular lagers these days. Nothing special, some decent malt notes in there, not too watery.
pmontegna (1) - Chicago, Illinois, USA - FEB 22, 2012 does not count
The total score for this beer is deceiving. The rating system doesn’t allow for an adequate cumulative score. The taste is particularly hard to score because this is almost a tasteless beer. The beer is very basic. It doesn’t have much an aroma or appearance either, but it is very soft and carbonated and very enjoyable. I only started drinking it, but I imagine this is the perfect summer beer. They’re very easy to drink and quite refreshing. StefanSD (2451) - Ouray, Colorado, USA - JAN 12, 2012
12 oz bottle. pale yellow pour with a small white head. Aroma is weak and indistinct with a hint of slightly overcooked vegetables. Taste is the same, cooked vegetables; celery in particular and a sweet malt base. The palate is thin and watery, with medium carbonation. Finishes short (thankfully). Overall: This Sucks. Wheres the HOPS?? ccex (1313) - Chicago, Illinois, USA - JAN 4, 2012
12 oz. bottle pours a pale yellow with a small white head. Practically nothing to smell Aroma is nondescript. At least it doesn’t have the corny aroma of so many cheap pale lagers. Very light, and almost watery but with noticeable carbonation. Goes down smooth with no aftertaste. The best I can say is that I find nothing offensive about it, other than the marketing. Mine was labeled as batch 0073, in an attempt to trick someone into believing that Genessee’s version of Bud Lite might be a craft beer. User134089 (1644) - - AUG 25, 2011
UPDATED: OCT 21, 2011 Poured from a bottle into a pint glass. About ¾ inches to an inch of head. Color was a clear golden. A slight lacing with a bit more white film on the sides of the glass on the initial pour. Fairly bland look.
Light malt, almost sweet, leads the way on the nose. The malt comes back with a deep sniff, more of a malty corn.
Initial taste was a bland, malty corn mix of average. That was about it, hardly an impressive following. Miller Lite comes to mind and I hate Miller Lite.
I guess I would call it refreshing, but bland and blah could replace refreshing. High on the carbonation. Corn and Miller Lite kept coming to mind. bb (9268) - Alamo, California, USA - MAR 30, 2011
Bottle. Golden beer with a whitish head. Light mineral and light malt aroma with light grass. Light mineral and light malt flavor. Medium bodied. Light mineral and light malt linger with light spice.