overall
1
13
style
RATINGS: 104   WEIGHTED AVG: 1.7/5   EST. CALORIES: 126   ABV: 4.2%
COMMERCIAL DESCRIPTION
Dirigida a todos los chilenos, esta cerveza, es la marca principal de CCU y es considerada como patrimonio nacional. Líder en el mercado, fue lanzada en 1985 y su slogan “única, grande y nuestra” resume su arraigo entre los chilenos. Fue la primera marca nacional en ingresar al Marketing Hall of Fame. Su presencia en el deporte y en destacados eventos la hacen la cerveza preferida de los chilenos.

Tick this beer for your profile
  • Currently 0/5 Stars.
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5


1.3
solidfunk (9363) - Washington D.C., Washington DC, USA - DEC 9, 2011
this is one bad beer. By far the worst I’ve had in Chile - strange that the worst ones are always what the most people drink. Glad I only had a small glass someone gave me from a bottle. Foul and pissy.

1.6
l1br4r14n (451) - Rancho Cucamonga, California, USA - AUG 18, 2011
Another cheap pale lager. Clear, pale gold with white head. Thin, light, a little bitter.

1.1
MadIndian (2743) - Levittown, Pennsylvania, USA - JUL 27, 2011
Gift from SJ. Clear thin yellow pour with a grai and corn aroma . Thin and bland in taste.

2.1
RuneStumo (2696) - Haugesund, NORWAY - JAN 28, 2011
28.01.2011. 0,33l Bottle. Pale yellow colour with white head. Aroma is weak malty with some kind of grassy hops. There is not to much flavours in this one. Refreshing when cold.

1.7
RC8 (305) - Toronto, Ontario, CANADA - JAN 2, 2010
Well... this is what it is. Bottled. Watery feel and taste. At least it doesn’t have an offensive taste (ala bud light, bud light lime, or bud). Should only be had in desperate situations or out of curiosity.

2.1
Derek881 (1272) - Denver, Colorado, USA - NOV 6, 2009
I had a few of these beers on my trip to Chile. The beer had a light gold color with a smaller white head with modest features. Its aroma was some grassy hops and a bit of barley malt, nothing distinguishing. A decent lightly bitter flavor with some light hops. The beer was on the thinner side, a bit watery and wet and had low carbonation. Nothing too exciting about the beer, but it was decent and cheap.

1.5
ketchepillar (1199) - Albuquerque, New Mexico, USA - NOV 4, 2009
Ah it seems they’ve changed the packaging a little. Now my liter bottle has a pry-off cap instead of a plastic screw off one. Bottle says 4.6%. Super pale. Cleaner than escudo, much less garbage. Lighter too, but that’s mainly probably just the lower alcohol.

1.4
HughConway (831) - Washington, USA - AUG 24, 2009
Bottle. It’s yellow, it’s white, it’s beery, it’s industrially bad. Indistinguishable from Escudo except in price.

1.3
Travlr (25846) - Charlotte, North Carolina, USA - JUL 31, 2009
Pale piss yellow, not much aroma. Huge white head. Mildly bitter flavor, not much finish. Forgettable.

1.8
imdownthepub (15160) - Banbury, Oxfordshire, ENGLAND - JAN 9, 2009
Bottled, 355ml?, pasteurised, from Mel, cheers. Pale gold with white head. Hard to distinguish from many Pale lagers, thin and corny, a little sulpherous on the nose, sweetish. Not the worst, but nothing that makes it drinkable either.


We Want To Hear From You



Join us! RateBeer is made by beer enthusiasts for the craft beer community. Your basic membership is free and allows you to read all beer ratings. Click here to create your account... and give your opinion!

Join Us »



Page  1 2 3 4  5  6 7 8 9 10 11 12
Tick this beer for your profile
  • Currently 0/5 Stars.
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5