overall
9
4
style
Brewed by Brouwerij De Troch
Style: Lambic Style - Gueuze
Ternat-Wambeek, Belgium

bottling
unknown

on tap
unknown

distribution
unknown

Add Distribution Data
RATINGS: 180   WEIGHTED AVG: 2.45/5   EST. CALORIES: 165   ABV: 5.5%
No commercial description

A tick is a star rating
  • Currently 0/5 Stars.
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5


1.9
kook (2033) - Perth, Western Australia, AUSTRALIA - JAN 15, 2005
Pours suprisingly dark amber with a short lasted small white head. Balsamic vinegar, brown sugar and dry white grape aroma. Horrible sweet brown sugar flavour, with biscuit notes. Weird, not good.

1.7
Joeh (2049) - Buckinghamshire, ENGLAND - JAN 6, 2005
Bottle from Beer Tempel in Brussels. Bottle neck broke on opening as with the faro. Horrible vinegar aroma. Flavour is oversweet yet also with some unrefined sourness and quite syrupy. Horrible wannabe gueuze.

1.7
dornoy (701) - Copenhagen, DENMARK - DEC 19, 2004
Strange beer indeed. Its "aroma" reminds mostly of vinegar, it pours no head at all, and its body is hazy dark brownish. As for the taste, I am lucky they added sugar, because the underlying sourness would have been too much to finish the bottle. I did finish the bottle, though, but I don’t think I’ll have another of this one.

1.3
Emil (6064) - Copenhagen, DENMARK - NOV 13, 2004
UPDATED: FEB 18, 2005 Dark golden color, light sweet fruity malty aroma andartificial taste, light body, watery finish.

1.1
Nate (4296) - Indiana, Pennsylvania, USA - NOV 5, 2004
Tart fruity soy sauce acidic aroma, low malt. Dark amber (almost brown) clear with thin off-white head. Medium watery body with almost no carbonation. Starts stale and sweet, light malts, fruity sourness that’s weak. Light metallic watery paper-like staleness. Horrible.

2.2
chriso (21656) - London, Greater London, ENGLAND - JUL 3, 2004
I guess I’ve been a bit spoiled for lambics up to now as a I have stuck to "the real thing". This manifestly is not the real thing. Hazy bronze pond water appearance. Very slight woody vinegar edge on the nose, but that’s about as close to a proper gueuze as it gets. The aroma is dominated by caramel and candy sugar. No barnyard here. Although there is some tartness on the palate, it could hardly be called sour. Whatever flavours there are battered into submission by a sticky, cloying sweetness. There is a synthetic tasting pear drop and cough medicine undertone. This tastes more like a sweetened farmyard cider, or even apple juice, than a gueuze to me and there’s simply not enough acidity to cut through the sweetness. Nor good. This should bump my gueuze average rating down a bit. 250ml bottle from beersofeurope.co.uk. BBE date illegible.

2.4
diabel (1723) - Aarschot, BELGIUM - JUN 15, 2004
Deep brown colour, muddy. Sweet aroma. Sweet flavour, lightly bitter. ...

3
fiulijn (21264) - Vancouver, British Columbia, CANADA - MAY 22, 2004
Amber color. Aroma of malt, Porto wine, sweet. Very sweet taste, with peculiar wine notes (common Porto wine). It’s not a Gueuze, I should not like it, but I do!

1.5
Jeppe (2634) - Brooklyn, Alabama, USA - DEC 15, 2003
No head what so ever (I poured it 20cm from the glass!!). Mud coloured body. The nose is yeast and fruit (reminds me of Champagne...!!). The taste is awful!! Sour, acid and vinegar....

3.3
AndersR (196) - Århus, DENMARK - NOV 28, 2003
Non existing head. Yeasty fruity flavour (hints of vinegar?). Medium sour taste with fruity finish (apple) going over in sweeter aftertaste.


We Want To Hear From You



Join us! RateBeer is made by beer enthusiasts for the craft beer community. Your basic membership is free and allows you to read all beer ratings. Click here to create your account... and give your opinion!

Join Us »



Page  1 « 13 14 15  16  17 18 19
A tick is a star rating
  • Currently 0/5 Stars.
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5