overall
20
94
style
Brewed by Church-Key Brewing
Style: Pale Lager
Campbellford, Canada

bottling
unknown

on tap
unknown

distribution
unknown

Add Distribution Data
RATINGS: 44   WEIGHTED AVG: 2.57/5   EST. CALORIES: 150   ABV: 5%
COMMERCIAL DESCRIPTION
Specially brewed for the 100 year anniversary of the Peterborough, Ontario Lift Lock. Kept on as a regular release.

Tick this beer for your profile
  • Currently 0/5 Stars.
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5


2.7
Oakes (18199) - Vancouver, British Columbia, CANADA - APR 7, 2005
UPDATED: APR 14, 2005 Draught, Winking Judge

Light copper. Clean malty character. Bready fresh and warming. Aroms is lightly fuggley. Quite respectable issuance from John Graham.

2.4
Lubiere (14110) - Ottawa, Ontario, CANADA - SEP 14, 2006
Light golden beer with a thin white head. Aroma is lightly funky grass, with light pear notes. In mouth, a decent caramel malt, grainy with fruity sweet notes, more berry-ish. Light bodied. Might be on verge of infection. Bought by Inertia Boy, August 2006.

1.9
Sammy (12491) - Toronto, Ontario, CANADA - JUN 28, 2006
A small step above a macro and unfinishable. Pale yellow with initial good head some malt taste. metallic, light body.Aggressive carbonation. A tad of hop and bland finish. Served cold but not ridiculously cold at the Rhino. Aroma is cheese and malt.

2.8
jercraigs (10651) - Toronto, Ontario, CANADA - AUG 20, 2004
pale yellow with a thin white head. Aroma is slightly fruity, and reminiscent of their Northumberland Ale making me wonder if it is the same yeast. This is a plus for me since I am a fan of the Northumberland. Relatively bland flavour profile, with the fruity notes the dominant flavour with a touch of malt. Palate is light but appropriate. Meh... accomplishes what it set out to do nicely.

2.9
mabel (9246) - Toronto, Ontario, CANADA - AUG 5, 2008
[1323-20080503] Tap. Grainy alcohol aroma has sweet floral notes. Clear, medium orange body with a quick white head. Sweet grainy alcohol flavour has a bit of yeasty banana. Medium body. Fair.
(@ Church Key; Campbellford, ON)

2.2
TaktikMTL (7874) - Montréal, Quebec, CANADA - SEP 29, 2006
Bouteille de 341 ml achetée directement à la brasserie. Arôme: Odeur herbacé et fruité. Apparence: La couleur est blonde pâle avec une faible densité de bulle. Présence d’un mince col mousseux. Saveur: Goût de céréale légèrement fruité. Courte durée de l’arrière goût. Palette: Le corps et la texture sont mince. Faible effervescence en bouche. Légère présence de fruité en arrière goût. (Rating #675)

2.5
blankboy (7735) - Toronto, Ontario, CANADA - FEB 22, 2006
Draught at Smokeless Joe. Pours a very bubbly clear gold with a small diminishing white head. Aroma of grain, grass and mushrooms (thanks jerc) -- doesn’t smell very good. Flavour’s very grainy and quite carbonated with some very mild hops at the end. I did not care for this beer at all but I understand this is aimed at a much more mainstream macro Lager drinker. Still, it’s only slightly better then a macro Lager.

2.6
Radek Kliber (7470) - Toronto (Can) Krotoszyn (Pol), POLAND - AUG 10, 2004
Gold lager witha verage head . Medium bodied with some malt , touch of hops at second sip , touch of spice .

2.7
HogTownHarry (7062) - Toronto (Harbourfront), Ontario, CANADA - DEC 6, 2005
Draught. At Smokeless Joe. Poured clear light gold, slightly bubbly, with a small white diminishing head. Aroma - hel-lo Canadian beer! Where have you been? Very grainy, barley and rye, not vegetal or corny at all. Taste is also mostly grain, perhaps a little too much so, but this isn’t like all the other CDN macro crap, it’s straightforward and the rest of these people are missing a point - and not realizing that all the other CDN brews have turned into sweet apple juice mixed with cream corn., although this does get a bit apple-sweet on warming. Mouthfeel pretty average - this isn’t my cup of tea, but jeez, compared to MolBatt crap it’s ambrosia.

2.5
Boutip (6432) - Gatineau, Quebec, CANADA - JUN 20, 2005
Bottle: Poured a medium yellow color beer with a small head with almost no retention. Aroma is weak with only subtle hops being distinguishable. Taste is also a bit weak with more malt and hops then your average macros but not enough to truly satisfy a beer geek I guess (which is not the goal of the brewer here I think).


We Want To Hear From You



Join us! RateBeer is made by beer enthusiasts for the craft beer community. Your basic membership is free and allows you to read all beer ratings. Click here to create your account... and give your opinion!

Join Us »



Page    1  2 3 4 5
Tick this beer for your profile
  • Currently 0/5 Stars.
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5