Papsoe (25055) - Frederiksberg, DENMARK - MAY 5, 2006
(Bottle 35,5 cl) Pours a clear, pilsener golden with a creamy, white head. Very neutral aroma with a wee whiff of malt. Light-bodied with a soft but decent malty feel. Almost some caramelish notes. No aftertaste, no bitterness, but for a light beer this really ain’t that bad. 060406 Tmoney99 (15044) - Cincinnati, Ohio, USA - APR 18, 2004
No aroma. Light gold appearance with no head. This beer has no flavor. Another low carb beer that is equal to or worse than moist air. bu11zeye (13239) - Frisco (Dallas), Texas, USA - MAR 27, 2004
UPDATED: MAY 20, 2004 (Bottle) One of the new low-carb fad beers. If I rate this beer as a water it would rate much higher, as it tastes like it is 95% water. Since water does not have any carbs, hence they colored the water and called it beer. slowrunner77 (13006) - Reno, Nevada, USA - OCT 21, 2014
"this one is bad, but admittedly not as bad as some others, so i’ll spare it a <1 rating. wouldn’t buy it ever again, but there’s worse out there by far." daknole (11402) - Scottsdale, Arizona, USA - JUN 1, 2010
Wow this was bad. Piss water mixed with nasty city water. Wait, that might be too kind. Just plain piss water. And no buzz? Fuuuuuck that noise.
hopscotch (11336) - Vero Beach, Florida, USA - APR 24, 2004
Crystal clear, straw-colored lager with a small, fizzy, white head. The aroma and flavor are pretty much nondescript. Seltzer-like. Ultra light- bodied with a fizzy mouthfeel. Very short, crisp, clean finish. Given a choice, I guess I'd go with seltzer water. It's less expensive and has fewer carbs while tasting the same. DocLock (11112) - Lower Pottsgrove, Pennsylvania, USA - APR 9, 2004
Very little head. No aroma. Slightly bitter taste, but not hops. Finishes like dilute unswwetened lemonade. Piss poor. phaleslu (10750) - Cincinnati, Ohio, USA - JUL 22, 2009
Michelob Ultra knock-off that was rushed to market when that watery carb-less beer came out. Offers nothing in aroma, flavor, or anything else that makes beer worthwhile. Now that the Atkins craze is over, I have to wonder why this still exists. Erzengel (9629) - Wuppertal, GERMANY - JAN 28, 2014
12 fl.oz. bottle - 355ml Rating from somewhere before 2008: radagast83 (8534) - Arlington, Virginia, USA - JUL 26, 2006
Very watery, only slightly grainy, very slightly bitter. Nearly no aroma worth rating. Highly drinkable.
Yikes, I forgot about this beer, I wonder why? Watery, thin. I really hate having to "count" these cheap beers, but unfortunately there are so many of them. Tried one, tried them all? How many times can they make the same exact kind of pale lager formula?