RATINGS: 782   WEIGHTED AVG: 2.91/5   EST. CALORIES: 150   ABV: 5%
COMMERCIAL DESCRIPTION
Brewed for Dixie Brewing by Joseph Huber during the breweries renovation. Brewed in the EU as well.

Tick this beer for your profile
  • Currently 0/5 Stars.
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5


2.7
   AROMA 5/10   APPEARANCE 3/5   TASTE 6/10   PALATE 3/5   OVERALL 10/20
beerguy101 (5360) - Newark, California, USA - SEP 21, 2002
Very dark amber color, small head. Roasted malts, slightly sweet. Slight hoppyness. Lighter bodied, full flavored beer. Mouthfeel is full and round. Finish is clean. Smooth taste. Aftertaste is slightly bitter. Nice taste.

3.3
   AROMA 5/10   APPEARANCE 3/5   TASTE 7/10   PALATE 2/5   OVERALL 16/20
notalush (5835) - Denver, Colorado, USA - SEP 16, 2002
Ignore the critics and set aside what this beer is "supposed" to be, and just enjoy it for what it is. It is a very good, and very unique beer.

3.3
   AROMA 5/10   APPEARANCE 4/5   TASTE 6/10   PALATE 3/5   OVERALL 15/20
apoptosis (1317) - Denver, Colorado, USA - SEP 9, 2002
Very dark red-brown color. Thick head, decent retention. A metallic finish to this beer keeps me from really liking it despite its fully flavor. Medium hops.

2.6
   AROMA 5/10   APPEARANCE 3/5   TASTE 5/10   PALATE 3/5   OVERALL 10/20
stephen (308) - California, USA - SEP 3, 2002
Slightly roasty. Dark brown. Pretty good but I got a slightly oxidized bottle - bad aftertaste and diminishing flavor.

3.6
   AROMA 6/10   APPEARANCE 4/5   TASTE 7/10   PALATE 3/5   OVERALL 16/20
beerslayer (753) - New Jersey, USA - AUG 30, 2002
Good beer. Clean smooth taste kind of like a toasted malt flavor. I Would have it again.

2.3
   AROMA 3/10   APPEARANCE 3/5   TASTE 5/10   PALATE 2/5   OVERALL 10/20
TheRimmer (483) - Florida, USA - AUG 29, 2002
Smelled like fucking cabbage. Very stout like, malty. Its finish was bland and watery. Its just another "eh" beer. Got better towards the end of the bottle.

3.2
   AROMA 4/10   APPEARANCE 3/5   TASTE 7/10   PALATE 3/5   OVERALL 15/20
delacerveza (166) - Florida, USA - AUG 21, 2002
as far as lagers go, this wasnt so bad. st. pauli girl it aint. i was expecting more oomph given the name, maybe more smokiness or something, but it was fairly bland. id take it over a newcastle brown ale.

3
   AROMA 6/10   APPEARANCE 4/5   TASTE 6/10   PALATE 3/5   OVERALL 11/20
Hoss (607) - Florida, USA - AUG 14, 2002
An interesting effort though undistinguished. As some have said a weak porter is an apt discription, smooth.

4.4
   AROMA 8/10   APPEARANCE 5/5   TASTE 9/10   PALATE 5/5   OVERALL 17/20
Jfishback13 (273) - Royal Oak, Michigan, USA - AUG 4, 2002
This is truly my favorite lager. I know people think its too heavy for a lager and certainly too light to be a stout, but this is a great beer. Dont try to figure out what it is and just drink it. It leaves you with such a nice, slightly sweet flavor, its hard to resist. I havent had this beer in many months, but it got me started trying beers and good ones at that... It did for beer what the Dead Milkmen did for me in music... not great, but I love it for the transition it allowed me... and Ill always love it because of that.

3.1
   AROMA 6/10   APPEARANCE 4/5   TASTE 6/10   PALATE 3/5   OVERALL 12/20
ravidesai (978) - Bombay, INDIA - JUL 29, 2002
decent dark lager. roasty malt taste much likr aweak porter. initially sweet but ends ofn a dry acidic hoppy note. a well made but unexceptional beer.


We Want To Hear From You



Join us! RateBeer is made by beer enthusiasts for the craft beer community. Your basic membership is free and allows you to read all beer ratings. Click here to create your account... and give your opinion!

Join Us »



Page  1 « 67 68 69  70  71 72 73 » 79
Tick this beer for your profile
  • Currently 0/5 Stars.
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5