overall
4
46
style
Brewed by FEMSA - Cuauhtémoc-Moctezuma (Heineken)
Style: Pale Lager
Monterrey/Orizaba, Mexico

bottled
available

on tap
available

Broad Distribution

Add Distribution Data
RATINGS: 1538   WEIGHTED AVG: 2.08/5   IBU: 10   EST. CALORIES: 126   ABV: 4.2%
COMMERCIAL DESCRIPTION
A crisp, refreshing, light-bodied malt-flavored beer with a well-balanced finish. A Lager that drinks like a Pilsner. A liquid embodiment of living life to the fullest. A beverage made from pure spring water and the choicest hops. A beer with such good taste, it’s chosen you to drink it.

Tick this beer for your profile
  • Currently 0/5 Stars.
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5


1.5
tiggmtl (4545) - East York, Ontario, CANADA - MAY 19, 2004
Mild citrus aroma. Clear pale gold with thin, white, rapidly and fully diminishing head but good carbonation. A touch of citrus in a mildly sweet beer. Thin and highly carbonated. Good for cutting through a spicy meal but really not much as a beer to be savoured in it’s own right. The above all applies at cold temperatures. If it warms at all it becomes all grainy and corn flavours dominate. Bottle (green).

0.8
Eructoblaster (4183) - Gatineau, Quebec, CANADA - MAY 18, 2004
Golden effervescent body with instant-fading head. Horrible skunky/pissy nose and watery taste. Palate is unexistent. Is this a beer?

1.1
jfm (1724) - Holbæk, DENMARK - MAY 16, 2004
Piss golden color with no head. The taste is water with ugly notes of corn.

1.8
ancherrera (162) - Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA - MAY 16, 2004
Among the better light flavorless beers. Better than Corona with a nice bitterness. Goes great with Mexican food. Refreshing and crisp. Not bad really but uninspiring. Still... it’s what I drink with Mexican food.

2.6
Shag (2987) - Chattanooga, Tennessee, USA - MAY 13, 2004
This is a much better than Corona but what isn’t? A pale looking lager with a lemony crisp flavor. And that was even before I threw the lime in. Not a bad Mexican swill choice. Just not a good choice overall really.

1.3
fly (1486) - austin, Tejas, Texas, USA - MAY 7, 2004
Nothing terribly wrong with this. Nothing very right. Take it or leave it, but I will be leaving mine for sure, so you can have it.

5
jomer10 (4) - USA - MAY 6, 2004 does not count
My favorite beer. For a starving college student, this is high class. Smooth, crisp, refreshing taste. Great bottle. A+

1.4
FROTHINGSLOSH (7697) - GREENSBURG, Pennsylvania, USA - MAY 5, 2004
UPDATED: JAN 20, 2014 Sampled from a 12 oz green bottle, this beer poured a light golden color with a trace soapy white head that faded and left minimal lacing. The aroma was dryish with a bit of cracker and perfume. The flavor was dry, grainy and perfumey with a medicinal undertone. Medium length perfume and medicine finish. Light body. Pretty awful

2
kujo9 (1095) - North Ridgeville, Ohio, USA - MAY 5, 2004
Light gold w/ a short lived white head. Light grainy malt aroma, some green apple, lightly sweet(as in sugary) and hints of corn. Well balanced, lightly malty, a little bit of acidity from carbanation. There is a very, very, very, light hop flavor in the very finish and aftertaste. Highly carbonated, light bodied, but not watery, slighly prickly dry m/f. Mildly more exciting than American Macro swill.

2.3
jpknight22 (171) - Charlotte, North Carolina, USA - MAY 5, 2004
Yeah, finally made myself try this on a cinco de mayo whim - had it both on tap and in the bottle. Light traces of malt and hops and not much in the palate honestly... Appearance wasn’t too bad in the glass, but lacks the character of a truly good beer. Sadly enough, still better than most generic American Macros.


We Want To Hear From You



Join us! RateBeer is made by beer enthusiasts for the craft beer community. Your basic membership is free and allows you to read all beer ratings. Click here to create your account... and give your opinion!

Join Us »



Page  1 « 125 126 127  128  129 130 131 » 154
Tick this beer for your profile
  • Currently 0/5 Stars.
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5