overall
64
60
style
RATINGS: 2226   WEIGHTED AVG: 3.3/5   IBU: 35   EST. CALORIES: 165   ABV: 5.5%
COMMERCIAL DESCRIPTION
The alpha of the pack, Doggie Style Pale Ale complements a wide range of foods. Flavor notes: Grassy, citrus, and slight perfume hop aromas with subtlety sweet malt body Pairs with: Cheddar cheese, burgers, barbeque, Thai, Mexican

Tick this beer for your profile
  • Currently 0/5 Stars.
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5


3.6
patrick767 (4063) - fort wayne, Indiana, USA - DEC 9, 2005
UPDATED: DEC 11, 2005 bottle - This is a nice pale ale, and is on the high end of the bitterness scale for the style. It has a somewhat malty aroma, but the taste and aftertaste is dominated by the hops. This brew is a pretty good choice, though certainly not the best of what’s probably my favorite style, the pale ale.

2.9
Thaichile (599) - 10aFly, New Jersey, USA - DEC 8, 2005
Tap. Slight hops on the nose with a faded amber colour. Not much difference in flavor with the Flying Dog IPA actually. A much better pale ale than the IPA, but still nothing overwhelming.

3.1
albert007 (415) - Penobsquis, New Brunswick, CANADA - DEC 6, 2005
Deep amber color, nicely lasting creamy/rocky off-white head, leaves a nice lace. Mild resiny hop aroma, caramelly hints and a bit of pepper. Smooth tasting malty brew with a slightly bitter finish.

3.1
zach8270 (4022) - Henrietta, New York, USA - DEC 1, 2005
UPDATED: DEC 14, 2008 [bottle - 12 oz] Clear orange. No head. Some lacing though. The description says it’s supposed to have lots of hops, but the aroma doesn’t really have much to it. Some sweet malts, and it took me a minute to find any of the hops. The taste on the other hand has a nice hop flavor to it. Lots of hops up front with a slightly sweet taste following it and then a crisp and slightly dry hoppy finish. The aftertaste is a cross between hops and citrus.

2.9
Metalhead (644) - Lake Zurich, Illinois, USA - NOV 30, 2005
Just wasn’t impressed with this one. It didn’t suck but nothing stood out. The citrus/pine combo was so not there. Hops were pretty lame as well. It WAS pretty drinkable. Mine was gone in like 5 minutes because I kept taking a mouthfull hoping for something that stood out. Nothing did. Rather boring.

3.3
OKBeer (1171) - Halifax, Nova Scotia, CANADA - NOV 26, 2005
12 oz. bottle. Amber colour with a mostly lasting frothy off-white head. Caramel and pine aroma with citrus and brown sugar notes. Cereal malt flavours with a nutty, citrus, and lightly perfumed bitter finish. Medium bodied with a dry finish.

3.7
Nejhleader (1559) - Lemoyne, Pennsylvania, USA - NOV 25, 2005
a nice hoppy aroma, pretty good hops for a pale ale, has a nice aftertaste a bit dry. fairly smooth and drinkable, pretty decent stuff.

3.4
shrubber85 (11390) - Greenville, Indiana, USA - NOV 25, 2005
Bottle. Strong peach malt and hops aroma. Orange-red-brown color with small head. Slightly sweet peach malt flavor with strong hops finish - not too overpowering. Nice flavor with nice bitterness.

3.3
Enniskillen (2051) - Bakersfield, California, USA - NOV 21, 2005
Decent pa. Smooth, a bit bigger and it would be on par with snpa. nice hop and malt backbone that keeps you interested.

4.3
awebster (165) - Knoxville, Tennessee, USA - NOV 19, 2005
A great pale ale. Crisp, clean, good hop character and finish. Light/medium bodied.


We Want To Hear From You



Join us! RateBeer is made by beer enthusiasts for the craft beer community. Your basic membership is free and allows you to read all beer ratings. Click here to create your account... and give your opinion!

Join Us »



Page  1 « 176 177 178  179  180 181 182 » 223
Tick this beer for your profile
  • Currently 0/5 Stars.
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5