overall
63
59
style
RATINGS: 2197   WEIGHTED AVG: 3.3/5   IBU: 35   EST. CALORIES: 165   ABV: 5.5%
COMMERCIAL DESCRIPTION
The alpha of the pack, Doggie Style Pale Ale complements a wide range of foods. Flavor notes: Grassy, citrus, and slight perfume hop aromas with subtlety sweet malt body Pairs with: Cheddar cheese, burgers, barbeque, Thai, Mexican

A tick is a star rating
  • Currently 0/5 Stars.
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5


3.6
LordHedgehog (144) - Westminster, Maryland, USA - SEP 5, 2001
Actually, it is slightly overwhelmingly hoppy, and I usually consider myself a hophead. Pretty darn good ale. The malt is still detectable, but the greeny hops are the first and strongest flavor. Not a subtle beer. Remarkedly not bitter for the strong hop taste. Overall Impression: I'm a big IPA fan. This is thinner, weaker, and a bit maltier. Definately not a bad ale. I'll be buying more of this in the future, although I don't think I'll always keep some on hand. If you like hops or IPA's, its undoubtedly worth trying.

3.3
VENOM (941) - Connecticut, USA - AUG 2, 2001
Decent brew. The malt choice doens't complement the Cascades that well. Nice mouthfeel and an overall average session beer but nothing spectacular.

1.4
ccwinnies99 (10) - ardmore, Oklahoma, USA - JUL 15, 2001
Maybe I got a bad batch. I had trouble giving this away.....................

3.4
Skootch99 (1) - Wheeling, West Virginia, USA - JUL 12, 2001 does not count
..................................................

3.4
Shadallion (534) - Sacramento, California, USA - JUL 4, 2001
Slightly above average pale ale. Nice melony, hoppy character that bears a strong resemblance to the better-known Mirror Pond Pale Ale from Deschutes.

2.9
BeerLimey (2155) - California, USA - JUN 6, 2001
UPDATED: NOV 16, 2004 Everyone says hoppy, but maybe it’s just a lack of malt character. Orangey, a little citric in the finish, but not as much bite as an IPA. I was a little disappointed as it seemed too thin for a pale ale.

3.1
The Friar99 (223) - Wisconsin, USA - MAY 19, 2001
A little too hoppy for my taste, but not as bad as Heineken.................

3.4
THE BEER BARON (275) - Wisconsin, USA - MAY 19, 2001
I thought this beer smelled really clean, almost soapy. The taste was pretty good though.

3.2
Indra (2710) - Suburbia, Kansas, USA - MAR 9, 2001
UPDATED: NOV 6, 2005 Whoa, hoppy! This is not what I would call a well-balanced beer necessarily, but the total hophead within likes the overpowering bitterness. So, a mixed review from me. Good, but not great.

4.2
MainerInExile (41) - Nashua, New Hampshire, USA - JAN 28, 2001
I really liked this beer. It has a lot going for it. First, the aroma. Floral and hoppy. I'm not sure floral is the word I'm looking for, but it's the best I can come up with. Then there's the taste. Superbly balanced between the malt and delicious hops. There's something else in there that I can't quite identify, probably the same thing I couldn't quite identify in the aroma. It makes for an interesting pale ale, and it works. This is definitely one I'll come back to again.


We Want To Hear From You



Join us! RateBeer is made by beer enthusiasts for the craft beer community. Your basic membership is free and allows you to read all beer ratings. Click here to create your account... and give your opinion!

Join Us »



Page  1 « 221 222 223  224  225
A tick is a star rating
  • Currently 0/5 Stars.
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5