emancomeith (8) - - FEB 20, 2011 does not count laur11 (20) - - APR 25, 2013
2.6 AROMA 5/10 APPEARANCE 3/5 TASTE 5/10 PALATE 3/5 OVERALL 10/20
Though not really "Australian for beer," Fosters is an easy-to-drink average brew.
Nothing special here.I was under the impression that this beer would put me on my ass.
As a matter of fact,several didnt.It was still a good beer that reminded me alot of Corona. Sully (1380) - Potts Point, New South Wales, AUSTRALIA - JUL 7, 2004
Extra? An additional .6%% How does this make it anything different from the blue labelled beer? There is a definite difference though, and not a favourable one. Very chemically and poor. lasonovich (151) - AUSTRALIA - OCT 7, 2003
Much better than ordinary fosters, has a nice strong flavour and a good alcohol content. Difficult to get these days though. Winchester (75) - Struggle Town NSW, AUSTRALIA - AUG 31, 2003
UPDATED: OCT 10, 2003 A typical Fosters. Tastes the same as the Lager, with apparently more alcohol. Atleast ill pass out quicker so i dont have to drink this crap anynmore.
LoveABeer (141) - Melbourne, AUSTRALIA - MAR 31, 2003
Extra what? Its just Fosters Lager, with a pretty label on it. Sweet Chemical Corn taste, no aroma, bad aftertaste. Caton (160) - Sydney, AUSTRALIA - MAR 3, 2002
I think they forgot to add the extra bit of flavour, but sure delivered on the chemicals. duff (5484) - Copenhagen, DENMARK - DEC 10, 2001
This absolutely sucked, i can't belive it made it on this site, this tastes like chemical crap, like you motelpogo, i wouldn't be sad to see it go. DJH-Bird99 (208) - Nijkerk, NETHERLANDS - NOV 5, 2001
.................................................. motelpogo (7704) - Plzen, CZECH REPUBLIC - OCT 11, 2001
Extra just means a little more alcoholic. still the same lack of any flavour. haven't seen it around much lately. wouldn't be a great loss