morebier4me (140) - New York, USA - JUL 23, 2002
Fosters mean beer in Aussie land ... for it means a big ass can of beer for me to put down. nstal (237) - Houston, Texas, USA - JUL 22, 2002
Has the american style down, try to make up in marketing for what the beer lacks. The plain brew doesn’t have much going for it. GrainBeltGuzzler (249) - Goodhue, Minnesota, USA - JUL 21, 2002
Fosters australian for over-rated. Somewhat ok, very average considering the hype. Basically I would say heinekenesque in flavor and hype. Wakie (612) - Centreville, Virginia, USA - JUL 18, 2002
Very lacking lager. All marketing, no substance. ClarkVV (6708) - Boston, Massachusetts, USA - JUL 18, 2002
This has a big cereal taste and usually tastes fairly skunky/peppery. it then fades into a watery finish with a bad sweet aftertaste. the commercials are generally pretty good though. . .
bierkoning (13355) - La Tropica/Doarp, NETHERLANDS - JUL 16, 2002
Brewed in England, but that doesn’t make the beer drinkable. Hint of malt and metal in the bland aroma. Neutral, bit sweetish taste with hints of metal. No hopbitterness, slight fruitiness. Bland, mass-produced beer. gws57 (1276) - Saint Charles, Illinois, USA - JUL 14, 2002
I’ve really given Fosters a good try to impress me, and it can’t compare. Plus, it’s brewed in Canada, which must be Australian for ’Australia’ because it surely isn’t brewed there. Dissapointing. The oil cans are nifty. pivo (2685) - GERMANY - JUL 14, 2002
Sweetish malt nose and a typical gold pils color. Weak pils taste – light malt followed by a faint bitterness. Thin body. YogiBeera (2569) - New Jersey, USA - JUL 14, 2002
sweet hoppy aroma, thin and watery finish. An underaverage lager, only good if there is worse beer like Miller and you really want to make people at the party nicer than they are. beerlovinman99 (124) - USA - JUL 9, 2002
Must be served ice cold, or else it will smell slightly skunky. Ice code, it goes down pretty well -- smooth and refreshing.