bluemeow76 (693) - Lewis Center, Ohio, USA - JUL 4, 2002
OK, if I am at a bar and they don’t have any decent, interesting beer on tap (other than Bass - b/c Bass is my standby) So the bar doesn’t have Bass on tap and my choices are like Bud, BudLight, Miller, etc. AND Fosters...I will get the Fosters. So I guess I am saying it is usually the best choice out of a bunch of crappy beers at a typical American bar. anticop (79) - Porterville, California, USA - JUL 3, 2002
big ass cans.............................................. kumite56 (473) - Cordova, Tennessee, USA - JUL 3, 2002
Better than the standard american lager swill but not by much. A little more flavor (light hopps, some malt) but the operative word here is light. Would be good to slam a cold one down after mowing lawn but not good for much else. davidoc (113) - Chicago, Illinois, USA - JUL 2, 2002
UPDATED: MAR 21, 2008 Foster’s, Australian for ripoff. Not a bad beer, but don’t believe the hype. Mads Langtved (2243) - Copenhagen K, DENMARK - JUN 29, 2002
Very close to water, no bitternes or power at all!..........................
VA Homebrewer (525) - Portsmouth, Virginia, USA - JUN 28, 2002
A touch better than the average macroswill in that it does have SOME malt flavor and less rice/sugar/adjunct flavor. Still, it’s not very impressive. MuddyFox99 (16) - Adelaide, AUSTRALIA - JUN 25, 2002
agree with smc123, success in marketing than taste, which is watery, bland and with little hoppyness at all SJP (483) - Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, USA - JUN 24, 2002
I think this is a waste of my time. Tastes like anything from the big American breweries, but since it comes from Australia some people seem to think its exotic. The can is nice, but then I could just buy a 40oz. smc12399 (25) - Tennessee, USA - JUN 19, 2002
Not too bad actually. Have enjoyed them from time to time. I think the success here is more marketing than taste. srqbeerman99 (15) - sarasota, Florida, USA - JUN 15, 2002
Better than expected. reasaonbly priced, decent flavor and average color. ..