overall
3
40
style
Brewed by Fosters Brewing (CUB)
Style: Pale Lager
Southbank, Victoria, Australia

bottled
available

on tap
available

Broad Distribution

Add Distribution Data
RATINGS: 1894   WEIGHTED AVG: 2/5   EST. CALORIES: 147   ABV: 4.9%
COMMERCIAL DESCRIPTION
Filtered and pasteurised. Available with added carbon dioxide in keg, can and bottled formats. First brewed in 1887.
Available in Britain as Export.
"A light-coloured lager style, it presents full malt character with a balanced clean hop bitterness. Combined with a slightly hoppy, but yeasty/malty nose, Foster's lager is a full bodied beer with excellent drinkability."

Tick this beer for your profile
  • Currently 0/5 Stars.
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5


2
   AROMA 4/10   APPEARANCE 2/5   TASTE 4/10   PALATE 2/5   OVERALL 8/20
IneedAbuheer (69) - Ingleside, Illinois, USA - JUN 8, 2002
Typical standard lager along the lines of Bud, but with a bit more of a kick in taste. Serves its purpose the same as Bud too, for mass-quantity consumption.

0.5
   AROMA 1/10   APPEARANCE 1/5   TASTE 1/10   PALATE 1/5   OVERALL 1/20
mattduling (64) - Fairmont, West Virginia, USA - JUN 7, 2002
Australian for SHIT.

1.8
   AROMA 4/10   APPEARANCE 3/5   TASTE 3/10   PALATE 2/5   OVERALL 6/20
Brew4Dug (139) - Houston, Texas, USA - JUN 6, 2002
Fosters: Australian for Croc-piss. This standard lager tastes like you are eating the can along with it. It has an unusually bitter aftertaste and leaves a disturbing feeling in your stomach after a few. Not worth the hype.

1.2
   AROMA 2/10   APPEARANCE 2/5   TASTE 2/10   PALATE 1/5   OVERALL 5/20
bubslang (438) - Kentwood, Michigan, USA - JUN 3, 2002
unimpressive, basically an american macro, at an import price, definetely not worth the money.

2
   AROMA 3/10   APPEARANCE 2/5   TASTE 5/10   PALATE 1/5   OVERALL 9/20
JohnDo2000 (99) - Metairie, Louisiana, USA - MAY 31, 2002
For an aussie beer, Ill take XXXX because it doesnt ahve that metallic bite that fosters has (out of the tap or not).

1.6
   AROMA 6/10   APPEARANCE 3/5   TASTE 3/10   PALATE 3/5   OVERALL 1/20
austinpowers (2828) - New York, New York, USA - MAY 29, 2002
Got the bottle instead of the oilcan and am glad I did. Those oilcans always get warm before Im done with em! This is a very ordinary American Standard, but with a weird Aussie taste-twist that I cant pin down. Not all that great.

1.8
   AROMA 4/10   APPEARANCE 3/5   TASTE 3/10   PALATE 3/5   OVERALL 5/20
bbooth (115) - Gilbert, Arizona, USA - MAY 24, 2002
This was a basic american style lager. Not much taste, not much color, not much body, not very good.

1.2
   AROMA 2/10   APPEARANCE 2/5   TASTE 1/10   PALATE 2/5   OVERALL 5/20
Bulldog99 (13) - Montreal, Quebec, CANADA - MAY 23, 2002
Australian for piss. In all fairness, I had it in Canada and I dont think its the same as the Australian version but what I had was no better than your run of the mill Bud. I was looking forward to trying it. Maybe I was expecting too much.

2.4
   AROMA 4/10   APPEARANCE 3/5   TASTE 5/10   PALATE 2/5   OVERALL 10/20
Bolt (117) - Boulder Creek, California, USA - MAY 23, 2002
Nice beer for the beach, and prepping your self for the giant dipper. Can is always fun.

2.6
   AROMA 6/10   APPEARANCE 3/5   TASTE 6/10   PALATE 2/5   OVERALL 9/20
ucsbdude (68) - Santa Barbara, California, USA - MAY 21, 2002
Not bad on draft.Tastes like an American Standard with a skunky aroma and bitter aftertaste.


We Want To Hear From You



Join us! RateBeer is made by beer enthusiasts for the craft beer community. Your basic membership is free and allows you to read all beer ratings. Click here to create your account... and give your opinion!

Join Us »



Page  1 « 161 162 163  164  165 166 167 » 190
Tick this beer for your profile
  • Currently 0/5 Stars.
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5