overall
3
40
style
Brewed by Fosters Brewing (CUB)
Style: Pale Lager
Southbank, Victoria, Australia

bottled
available

on tap
available

Broad Distribution

Add Distribution Data
RATINGS: 1838   WEIGHTED AVG: 2/5   EST. CALORIES: 147   ABV: 4.9%
COMMERCIAL DESCRIPTION
Filtered and pasteurised. Available with added carbon dioxide in keg, can and bottled formats. First brewed in 1887.
Available in Britain as Export.
"A light-coloured lager style, it presents full malt character with a balanced clean hop bitterness. Combined with a slightly hoppy, but yeasty/malty nose, Foster's lager is a full bodied beer with excellent drinkability."

Tick this beer for your profile
  • Currently 0/5 Stars.
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5


4.6
samustdog (73) - USA - MAY 14, 2002
My favorite beer, can’t really explain why.

3.6
VTIrishman99 (64) - Virginia, USA - MAY 10, 2002
An excellent beer, though a tad bitter. I understand that the Australians wont touch the stuff with a 10 foot pole, though. The 25-oz cans are hella cool to rock into the party, but the drawback is that the beer is expensive, and it does lend itself well to hangovers. Again, this is the kind of brew you can have at a nice restaurant when youre eating with your girlfriend or something. Its just a nice, refreshing beer, but its got to be ice cold.

1.3
Rib Eye (148) - USA - MAY 7, 2002
It’s Australian for Canadian Beer mate! (Check the label; this is brewed in Canada for the U.S. market). Tastes like a fairly typical Candian macro. Not as putrid as Labatts or the Molson brews though. If I was really thirsty on a hot summer day and this is all there was to drink, I’d have one. Come to think of it, I’ve done just that!

1.4
shorlin (721) - St. John’s, Newfoundland, CANADA - MAY 7, 2002
Yellow. Foamy. Head looked OK for an instant, but then it was gone. Thin, weak. Generis macro stuff

2.4
collegiatebrew (22) - Defreestville, New York, USA - MAY 5, 2002
Goes down easy, tastes alright, but a bit too carbonated some others have been saying.

1.7
duece (103) - Waterford, Wisconsin, USA - APR 30, 2002
Unimpressive aroma with a fair head. From a can taste is a bit sour. Prefer cheap American mega brew for the price.

0.7
methanolbrats99 (6) - USA - APR 23, 2002 does not count
Undrinkable, horrible smell, overly carbonated, headache in a can. Yuuuck.

1.5
sethdude (706) - St. Louis, Missouri, USA - APR 22, 2002
Not too good. tasted like it was packaged in a sardine tin. The seaffood/metal taste was crap. I drank half the can and gave the rest to my friend.

3.8
gpolice99 (32) - Arizona, USA - APR 17, 2002
I LOVE this beer,has a a bit of a strong aftertaste, but I dont think its as bland as other reviewers. different tastes mate!

1.1
JoeM500 (1908) - Crown Point, Indiana, USA - APR 14, 2002
fizzy, fizzy, fizzy, tinny, rusty, tinny, tinny. The oil can adds even more tinnyness to this dreadful mix.


We Want To Hear From You



Join us! RateBeer is made by beer enthusiasts for the craft beer community. Your basic membership is free and allows you to read all beer ratings. Click here to create your account... and give your opinion!

Join Us »



Page  1 « 162 163 164  165  166 167 168 » 184
Tick this beer for your profile
  • Currently 0/5 Stars.
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5