Brewed by Fosters Brewing (CUB)
Style: Pale Lager
Southbank, Victoria, Australia


on tap

Broad Distribution

Add Distribution Data
RATINGS: 1838   WEIGHTED AVG: 2/5   EST. CALORIES: 147   ABV: 4.9%
Filtered and pasteurised. Available with added carbon dioxide in keg, can and bottled formats. First brewed in 1887.
Available in Britain as Export.
"A light-coloured lager style, it presents full malt character with a balanced clean hop bitterness. Combined with a slightly hoppy, but yeasty/malty nose, Foster's lager is a full bodied beer with excellent drinkability."

Tick this beer for your profile
  • Currently 0/5 Stars.
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

popilius (61) - Chicagoland, Illinois, USA - NOV 24, 2001
Rather bland but not terrible. Bitter aftertase the only positive.

obxdude10 (2324) - Pottstown, Pennsylvania, USA - NOV 22, 2001
The only difference between this and something like Bud, Coors or Miller is that this piece of junk is from another country

Andrew196 (1902) - Katy, Texas, USA - NOV 14, 2001
Insert ’Fosters...Australian for _______’ joke here. This is another beer that tries to play the foreign role to make Americans feel like they aren’t pansies. All it really does is put us all back in our respective places.

stosh99 (23) - Connecticut, USA - NOV 7, 2001
Big can = Average taste. Not horrible, just nothing special. get a Sammy instead

BudMan99 (9) - Blackville, New Brunswick, CANADA - NOV 5, 2001 does not count
It’s actually pretty good!!!! Better than I thought it was going to be....

Aurelius (5332) - Tallahassee, Florida, USA - NOV 2, 2001
UPDATED: JUN 2, 2003 When your choices are limited, this is a solid choice. Good bittering for a mass-production brew. Rerate 1/16/03: A few notes of caramel, a little bump for coming in a quart can. Defintely the best thing that you can get at the minit markit in a quart.

Albert (39) - Miramar, Florida, USA - OCT 29, 2001
There is nothing wrong with this beer, but at the same time it is completely forgettable. Aroma is minimal, palate has no bite. I’m not buying it but it might be the best there is to drink at somebody else’s party.

beerledgend (1196) - Waterloo, Wellington, NEW ZEALAND - OCT 25, 2001
Australian for water. Light colour. sweet malty nose with no taste.

Beer Guy99 (251) - Maineville, Ohio, USA - OCT 23, 2001
Here’s another beer with a lot of hype and very little substance. All show and no go. People gladly hand over import pricing for what they believe to be an authentic Australian classic. This beer is brewed in Canada and shipped to the U.S. so they can still put the word ’imported’ on the cans. Actually the Australian version is no better so at least it’s fresher coming from Canada. It is bland and very, very ordinary. Why pay the price when this beer isn’t even as good as Old Style, Ballantine or Schlitz? If you don’t believe me, do a blind taste test and let your own taste buds show you.

MilkmanDan (1943) - Eagan, Minnesota, USA - OCT 16, 2001
G’day. Foster’s--it’s Australian for average. I like the cans, so it gets a few more points, but tastewise there’s just nothing much going on.

We Want To Hear From You

Join us! RateBeer is made by beer enthusiasts for the craft beer community. Your basic membership is free and allows you to read all beer ratings. Click here to create your account... and give your opinion!

Join Us »

Page  1 « 174 175 176  177  178 179 180 » 184
Tick this beer for your profile
  • Currently 0/5 Stars.
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5