GrainBeltGuzzler (249) - Goodhue, Minnesota, USA - JUN 17, 2002
Rivals even Premium for top honors when it is from the tap or bottle instead of the can. vomit (260) - Michigan, USA - JAN 5, 2003
UPDATED: FEB 15, 2006 Not Blatz, but a close second. I wish I could get it around here still!
pjcoupe (105) - Perryton, Texas, USA - JUN 29, 2002
Very very good,well balanced,nice fruity like flavor,perfect carbonation no bitternes,pleasant aftertaste. Beer Guy99 (251) - Maineville, Ohio, USA - NOV 12, 2001
Nice everyday lager. The beer tastes fresh, clean and balanced. Nice tang of hops - more than I ever experienced from Miller or Bud products - and easy to drink. I like it and would recommend it to people who enjoy ’regular American lager.’ I don’t know why more people in Minnesota don’t drink this on a regular basis. Slick (1969) - Thief River Falls, Minnesota, USA - NOV 22, 2002
UPDATED: JUL 30, 2003 Not there best but it's up there.nicelight aroma with nice balance ,clean finish one of those cool off beer's for the hot summer
GrandMasterSexay (26) - Minnesota, USA - OCT 6, 2002
a little better than stuff from bud, etc. Premium is much better though HammsDrinker (21) - Dollar Bay, Michigan, USA - APR 14, 2005
Hey, it’s not Hamm’s, but it’s a good cheap beer and better than Bud or Miller. fraasch (5) - Edina, Minnesota, USA - APR 15, 2002 does not count
Just a little bit better than the average American macrobrew. LibraryBrewer (50) - Goodridge, Minnesota, USA - JUN 7, 2006
Old rate from about 7 years ago.Golden color,corn and cerealish aroma with a teasing of hops.Tastes pretty weak with the grains and corn being the predominant flavor with just a slight more hops then the previous brews from these people.Ehhh. truckie455 (42) - Derby, Connecticut, USA - MAY 25, 2001
Decent mass produced brew. Think Budweiser, only cheaper.