badnewsbeers (2312) - Grand Rapids, Michigan, USA - OCT 18, 2004
3.2 AROMA 6/10 APPEARANCE 4/5 TASTE 6/10 PALATE 4/5 OVERALL 12/20
UPDATED: MAR 23, 2005 i liked this guinness better than the Extra Stout one...a beautiful pour...nice flat creamy palate...creamy head...a mocha chocolate flavor....nothing special here but a good beer nonetheless
Hunsell (403) - Amsterdam, NETHERLANDS - OCT 16, 2004
3.9 AROMA 7/10 APPEARANCE 5/5 TASTE 8/10 PALATE 4/5 OVERALL 15/20
Well, hard to make a decision about this,because the quality of this stuff varies enormously from bar to bar, from city to city, from country to country.
The first Guinness I had was in Amsterdam. It was dreadful. Extremely bitter. It was so bitter that I hardly tasted anything else..
But I visited Dublin this year, and Guinness here is great, although quality, again, differs a lot.
A good Guinness, in my opinion, is not too bitter, but fresh, a bit sweet, and VERY creamy. The head lasts almost eternal and is very creamy.
Very enjoyable when served well!
Pigfoot (2268) - Minneapolis, Minnesota, USA - OCT 14, 2004
2.9 AROMA 6/10 APPEARANCE 4/5 TASTE 5/10 PALATE 2/5 OVERALL 12/20
Pouring the contents of this unique, innovative bottle creates the mythical creamy head and the magical flowing cascade, so favored in the pubs. Or is it just a cheap imitation?
Aroma nicely hints at coffee and cream, and a touch of chocolate, rich and luscious. Small amounts of bitterness,but exceptionally smooth on the tongue. Light body, thin texture, and far too soft for my taste.
It took me a while to understand the supreme appeal of Draught Guinness, for the Extra Stout was my bottle of choice in early days. I did a taste test between the two, and ultimately found that the draught version resembles a chocolate milkshake, or a mocha latte. Itís for people who want to go beyond fizzy lagers and such, but donít really want to approach the bold flavors and bitterness in a true stout or porter.
ElJefe (553) - Rochester, New York, USA - OCT 13, 2004
3.3 AROMA 6/10 APPEARANCE 4/5 TASTE 7/10 PALATE 2/5 OVERALL 14/20
UPDATED: SEP 2, 2007 Pours black with a large tan head. Aroma is malt, caramel, and coffee. Taste is much the same. The bottle version seems much lighter bodied than what you get on tap. I like the Guinness Extra Stout better, probably because Iím not a big fan of the nitrogen widget things. They make beer taste flat to me - and not just because of the lack of CO2. However, as stated earlier, when properly tapped and poured at a good pub, this seems to be a much better beer. All of the flavors seem enhanced, plus it has a slight sour kick that just isnít there in the bottled version. I would give it a 3.1 from the bottle and a 3.4 from the tap. I compromised to get the 3.3.
yayforbeer (753) - Orange Park, Florida, USA - OCT 13, 2004
3.1 AROMA 4/10 APPEARANCE 4/5 TASTE 6/10 PALATE 3/5 OVERALL 14/20
Bottle. An OK stout but I was expecting more. Dry and bitter but thin and lacking body. Sure looks good with a creamy nitro head and dark color. Its not expensive and you can get it anywhere. Maybe this works as a black & tan with Harp. Iíll try that next.
jcanj (23) - Michigan, USA - OCT 13, 2004
2.9 AROMA 5/10 APPEARANCE 4/5 TASTE 6/10 PALATE 2/5 OVERALL 12/20
This is not a bad Stout but there are a lot better ones out there. I know many people who fall in love with this beer and think it is the greatest but that have not tried "the good ones." It is nice to get this on tap at a lot of places and it wouldnít be St. Pattyís day with out a Guinness with a shamrock.
mjurney (64) - Amarillo, Texas, USA - OCT 11, 2004
4.8 AROMA 9/10 APPEARANCE 5/5 TASTE 9/10 PALATE 5/5 OVERALL 20/20
UPDATED: DEC 19, 2004 Pours out deep black with nice head. Nice mocha flavor, very thick and cream. Also really smooth. This stuff is great!! One of the best stout I ever had.
BJM8 (17) - USA - OCT 11, 2004
1.9 AROMA 3/10 APPEARANCE 2/5 TASTE 3/10 PALATE 2/5 OVERALL 9/20
Overrated! Not bad if youíre in a restaurant with very little offerings, but letís face it...with many other great beers out there, this is just so-so, boring, and not very good.
sfontain (851) - Columbus, Ohio, USA - OCT 10, 2004
2.8 AROMA 5/10 APPEARANCE 5/5 TASTE 5/10 PALATE 2/5 OVERALL 11/20
I havenít had this since I started rating, 210-something beers ago. And Iíve concluded that this beer sucks. I used to love it, and now that I know better it really bites. Looks good, though: Near-black with a monstrous, thick, creamy, beige head. Aroma isnít even bad, though a little subdued: Chocolate, coffee. Flavor is rather gross, a bit like cigarette ashes; also some coffee grinds and light toffee. The most watery stout Iíve had, I think, and not nearly as thick as I used to think. The nitro gives it a little body, but not enough, though I suspect I might have a bad bottle here. Overall, except to try, or if itís the only thing your restaurant has thatís better than Budweiser, stay away from Guinness Draught.
Loddeer (171) - USA - OCT 8, 2004
3.9 AROMA 6/10 APPEARANCE 5/5 TASTE 8/10 PALATE 4/5 OVERALL 16/20
UPDATED: OCT 15, 2004 Chocolate coffee goodness, the texture and consistency is so smooth and creamy. This can go down perfectly with a formal dinner or just a night at the bars. Enjoyable, accessible, and extremely satisfying ... guinness is definitely worth every penny. Its versatility is its best characteristic. (dare I mention "Car Bomb"?)