overall
19
96
style
Brewed by St. James’s Gate (Diageo)
Style: Pale Lager
Dublin, Ireland

bottling
unknown

on tap
available

Broad Distribution

Add Distribution Data
RATINGS: 1761   WEIGHTED AVG: 2.77/5   EST. CALORIES: 129   ABV: 4.3%
COMMERCIAL DESCRIPTION
Bright pale golden; fruity nose; crisp and clean, slightly bitter up front, smooth aftertaste.

Tick this beer for your profile
  • Currently 0/5 Stars.
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5


4
MarshallMac (143) - West Vancouver, British Columbia, CANADA - MAY 5, 2002
a good run-of-the-mill lager. had a couple of these one night with a few buddies, i like the beer...its cool crisp and clean, very nice

4.4
bkuzmin99 (20) - Pennsylvania, USA - MAY 1, 2002
One of my favorites. Goes down nice and smooth with no aftertaste. Only drawback is the tap MUST be clean out of which it is served or else you really notice it.

3.6
DEbeer (192) - West Virginia, USA - APR 30, 2002
This beer reminds me a toned-down Guinness. It isn't bad at all. If you think that Guinness is just too vicious, Harp may be a good alternative.

2.8
groovinhigh (170) - Asheville, North Carolina, USA - APR 30, 2002
Ok British Lager. Not very flavorful, but crisp and clean. .................

2.9
OldJack99 (114) - USA - APR 28, 2002
Nothing too special really, a bitter hay/wheat flavor, perfect head & color made my mouth water but somehow was a little disappointed after paying five dollars for one draw of it. Just bought it to rate it, won't buy again, too many other beers cheaper & better. Its like 8 or 9 dollars a 6 pack at my liquor store!

4.1
naes66699 (18) - USA - APR 23, 2002
I love this beer, nice for when I am real sick and cant drink Guinness. Mixes well with Guinness...

2.3
krisfleet (130) - Sharon, Pennsylvania, USA - APR 22, 2002
Not as good as I had thought it would be. This beer doesn't deserve to have the name guiness on it. Nowhere near as flavorful as its dark brother, but none the less better than a domestic.

3.3
hankfrank99 (13) - USA - APR 21, 2002
got a lot more flavor than most lagers, but the aftertaste is a bit strong. expensive and not my favorite, but not a bad beer either.

3.2
guinness4life (37) - USA - APR 20, 2002
UPDATED: MAY 21, 2003 completely different beer than when I used to drink it. Apparently its now brewed in Canada. Not nearly as good as it was when they brewed it in dundalk.

3.5
ultraspank (867) - Alverca, Lisboa, PORTUGAL - APR 20, 2002
Had one of these on tap at the Old Bag of Nails in Grandview. This brew pours a clear golden. The average creamy white head is mostly diminishing with good lacing. The fruity nose has hints of flowers and perfume, along with caramel. The light crisp flavor is mostly sweet, and finishes with a nutty astringent bitterness. The smooth light creamy palate has soft carbonation. Bland, but still above average.


We Want To Hear From You



Join us! RateBeer is made by beer enthusiasts for the craft beer community. Your basic membership is free and allows you to read all beer ratings. Click here to create your account... and give your opinion!

Join Us »



Page  1 « 163 164 165  166  167 168 169 » 184
Tick this beer for your profile
  • Currently 0/5 Stars.
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5