overall
18
96
style
Brewed by St. James’s Gate (Diageo)
Style: Pale Lager
Dublin, Ireland

bottling
unknown

on tap
available

Broad Distribution

Add Distribution Data
RATINGS: 1765   WEIGHTED AVG: 2.76/5   EST. CALORIES: 129   ABV: 4.3%
COMMERCIAL DESCRIPTION
Bright pale golden; fruity nose; crisp and clean, slightly bitter up front, smooth aftertaste.

A tick is a star rating
  • Currently 0/5 Stars.
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5


3.1
neilrichards (191) - Leicestershire, ENGLAND - MAY 10, 2002
An average lager. It's better than a lot of the piss type beers that you get in bottles (bud, sol etc.) but not as good as some continental, export strength efforts.

3.3
Steak (124) - New York, USA - MAY 6, 2002
Good fruity aroma. Golden color is nothing enticing, considering its so close to other 'american standards'. Very smooth and crisp, what a traditional lager should be like. It's not bursting with flavor, because it's not supposed to.

4
MarshallMac (143) - West Vancouver, British Columbia, CANADA - MAY 5, 2002
a good run-of-the-mill lager. had a couple of these one night with a few buddies, i like the beer...its cool crisp and clean, very nice

4.4
bkuzmin99 (20) - Pennsylvania, USA - MAY 1, 2002
One of my favorites. Goes down nice and smooth with no aftertaste. Only drawback is the tap MUST be clean out of which it is served or else you really notice it.

3.6
DEbeer (192) - West Virginia, USA - APR 30, 2002
This beer reminds me a toned-down Guinness. It isn't bad at all. If you think that Guinness is just too vicious, Harp may be a good alternative.

2.8
groovinhigh (170) - Asheville, North Carolina, USA - APR 30, 2002
Ok British Lager. Not very flavorful, but crisp and clean. .................

2.9
OldJack99 (114) - USA - APR 28, 2002
Nothing too special really, a bitter hay/wheat flavor, perfect head & color made my mouth water but somehow was a little disappointed after paying five dollars for one draw of it.

Just bought it to rate it, won't buy again, too many other beers cheaper & better. Its like 8 or 9 dollars a 6 pack at my liquor store!

4.1
naes66699 (18) - USA - APR 23, 2002
I love this beer, nice for when I am real sick and cant drink Guinness.
Mixes well with Guinness...

2.3
krisfleet (130) - Sharon, Pennsylvania, USA - APR 22, 2002
Not as good as I had thought it would be. This beer doesn't deserve to have the name guiness on it. Nowhere near as flavorful as its dark brother, but none the less better than a domestic.

3.3
hankfrank99 (13) - USA - APR 21, 2002
got a lot more flavor than most lagers, but the aftertaste is a bit strong. expensive and not my favorite, but not a bad beer either.


We Want To Hear From You



Join us! RateBeer is made by beer enthusiasts for the craft beer community. Your basic membership is free and allows you to read all beer ratings. Click here to create your account... and give your opinion!

Join Us »



Page  1 « 163 164 165  166  167 168 169 » 184
A tick is a star rating
  • Currently 0/5 Stars.
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5