overall
20
96
style
Brewed by St. Jamesís Gate (Diageo)
Style: Pale Lager
Dublin, Ireland

bottling
unknown

on tap
available

Broad Distribution

Add Distribution Data
RATINGS: 1832   WEIGHTED AVG: 2.77/5   EST. CALORIES: 129   ABV: 4.3%
COMMERCIAL DESCRIPTION
Bright pale golden; fruity nose; crisp and clean, slightly bitter up front, smooth aftertaste.

Tick this beer for your profile
  • Currently 0/5 Stars.
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5


3.5
   AROMA 7/10   APPEARANCE 3/5   TASTE 7/10   PALATE 4/5   OVERALL 14/20
duece (103) - Waterford, Wisconsin, USA - APR 3, 2002
Mild bite with short smooth aftertaste. Wonderful for a half & half.

4.5
   AROMA 10/10   APPEARANCE 5/5   TASTE 10/10   PALATE 3/5   OVERALL 17/20
Willdrink4beer99 (9) - USA - APR 2, 2002 does not count
great brew, not that great finish but has alot going for it in the flavor category/

3.1
   AROMA 5/10   APPEARANCE 3/5   TASTE 6/10   PALATE 4/5   OVERALL 13/20
BillKismet (3975) - Seattle, Washington, USA - APR 1, 2002
A good standard beer. Although not extraordinary in any way, it has no noticeable detractions either. Certainly has an enjoyable crispness and a smooth finish with maybe feint fruity/hoppy touch.

3.8
   AROMA 7/10   APPEARANCE 4/5   TASTE 7/10   PALATE 4/5   OVERALL 16/20
Cruddler (32) - Cincinnati, Ohio, USA - MAR 30, 2002
Nice light beer. As good as I rember from my youth.

3
   AROMA 6/10   APPEARANCE 3/5   TASTE 6/10   PALATE 3/5   OVERALL 12/20
Andrew196 (1734) - Katy, Texas, USA - MAR 29, 2002
I somehow forgot to rate this beer a long time ago. This is probably the best of its kind...just not my style though. It is crisp and smooth, with a decent flavor. No skunkiness like many American Standards.

3.2
   AROMA 6/10   APPEARANCE 3/5   TASTE 5/10   PALATE 4/5   OVERALL 14/20
dprior (118) - Somerville, Massachusetts, USA - MAR 27, 2002
Not much to speak of in Aroma and Appearance. It makes up for it flavor and palate though. Kick it a point or two extra for being the beer that turned me on to beer (the first beer I truly loved). RE-RATE: I tried this yet again, and I canít give this beer a 3.7. Itís got too much of a bitter aftertaste.

4.1
   AROMA 8/10   APPEARANCE 5/5   TASTE 8/10   PALATE 4/5   OVERALL 16/20
twocycle99 (61) - Cherry Hill, New Jersey, USA - MAR 26, 2002
the slight bitterness at first taste is replaced by a smooth aftertaste

2.9
   AROMA 7/10   APPEARANCE 3/5   TASTE 6/10   PALATE 3/5   OVERALL 10/20
pjcoupe (105) - Perryton, Texas, USA - MAR 24, 2002
Pretty wicked flavor great on tap under some guinness.

1.5
   AROMA 3/10   APPEARANCE 2/5   TASTE 3/10   PALATE 2/5   OVERALL 5/20
spydog (75) - Chandler, Arizona, USA - MAR 23, 2002
UPDATED: DEC 30, 2003 Smooth with a slight malty sweetness. Not as toasty as some lagers. More flavor than the color would indicate, but still tastes like crap.

3
   AROMA 4/10   APPEARANCE 4/5   TASTE 6/10   PALATE 3/5   OVERALL 13/20
tapIluv99 (41) - Plano, Texas, USA - MAR 23, 2002
This lager was tastefull...smooth hoppy brew.


We Want To Hear From You



Join us! RateBeer is made by beer enthusiasts for the craft beer community. Your basic membership is free and allows you to read all beer ratings. Click here to create your account... and give your opinion!

Join Us »



Page  1 « 164 165 166  167  168 169 170 » 184
Tick this beer for your profile
  • Currently 0/5 Stars.
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5