Willdrink4beer99 (9) - USA - APR 2, 2002 does not count
great brew, not that great finish but has alot going for it in the flavor category/ BillKismet (4146) - Seattle, Washington, USA - APR 1, 2002
A good standard beer. Although not extraordinary in any way, it has no noticeable detractions either. Certainly has an enjoyable crispness and a smooth finish with maybe feint fruity/hoppy touch. Cruddler (32) - Cincinnati, Ohio, USA - MAR 30, 2002
Nice light beer. As good as I rember from my youth......................... Andrew196 (2015) - Katy, Texas, USA - MAR 29, 2002
I somehow forgot to rate this beer a long time ago. This is probably the best of its kind...just not my style though. It is crisp and smooth, with a decent flavor. No skunkiness like many American Standards. dprior (118) - Somerville, Massachusetts, USA - MAR 27, 2002
Not much to speak of in Aroma and Appearance. It makes up for it flavor and palate though. Kick it a point or two extra for being the beer that turned me on to beer (the first beer I truly loved). RE-RATE: I tried this yet again, and I can't give this beer a 3.7. It's got too much of a bitter aftertaste.
twocycle99 (61) - Cherry Hill, New Jersey, USA - MAR 26, 2002
the slight bitterness at first taste is replaced by a smooth aftertaste..... pjcoupe (105) - Perryton, Texas, USA - MAR 24, 2002
Pretty wicked flavor great on tap under some guinness....................... spydog (79) - Chandler, Arizona, USA - MAR 23, 2002
UPDATED: DEC 30, 2003 Smooth with a slight malty sweetness. Not as toasty as some lagers. More flavor than the color would indicate, but still tastes like crap. tapIluv99 (41) - Plano, Texas, USA - MAR 23, 2002
This lager was tastefull...smooth hoppy brew................................ olympian (107) - USA - MAR 23, 2002
Harp is a very good lager all by itself, and magnificent as a 'Black and Tan' with Guinness.
But while I like it, I also think it's one brew who's reputation outstrips it's actualy quality.
Certainly not a disappointment, though.