overall
20
96
style
Brewed by St. Jamesís Gate (Diageo)
Style: Pale Lager
Dublin, Ireland

bottling
unknown

on tap
available

Broad Distribution

Add Distribution Data
RATINGS: 1824   WEIGHTED AVG: 2.77/5   EST. CALORIES: 129   ABV: 4.3%
COMMERCIAL DESCRIPTION
Bright pale golden; fruity nose; crisp and clean, slightly bitter up front, smooth aftertaste.

Tick this beer for your profile
  • Currently 0/5 Stars.
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5


2.8
   AROMA 6/10   APPEARANCE 4/5   TASTE 5/10   PALATE 3/5   OVERALL 10/20
heykevin (1281) - Decorah, Iowa, USA - NOV 6, 2001
A very, very ordinary beer. Nowhere near woth the price tag. That said, better than Bud

4.1
   AROMA 8/10   APPEARANCE 4/5   TASTE 8/10   PALATE 4/5   OVERALL 17/20
brodieman99 (7) - Ellicott City, Maryland, USA - OCT 29, 2001 does not count
One of my favorites.

2.5
   AROMA 4/10   APPEARANCE 3/5   TASTE 5/10   PALATE 3/5   OVERALL 10/20
Radek Kliber (7239) - Toronto (Can) Krotoszyn (Pol), POLAND - OCT 28, 2001
UPDATED: JAN 7, 2003 Maybe it was not freah but it was a bit skunky and bitter . For bitter beer lovers.

3.3
   AROMA 6/10   APPEARANCE 3/5   TASTE 7/10   PALATE 3/5   OVERALL 14/20
cogman99 (7) - Toronto, Ontario, CANADA - OCT 24, 2001 does not count
Crisp, simple lager. Relatively smooth with little aftertaste. Try it as a half and half with Guinness.

2
   AROMA 2/10   APPEARANCE 3/5   TASTE 7/10   PALATE 2/5   OVERALL 6/20
kingstratego (82) - Gršvenwiesbach, GERMANY - OCT 21, 2001
Smells a bit stale even when itís fresh from tap. Tastes a bit weak but refreshing.

2.3
   AROMA 4/10   APPEARANCE 3/5   TASTE 3/10   PALATE 3/5   OVERALL 10/20
Eoin Ruane99 (1) - USA - OCT 19, 2001 does not count
This beer lacks any real flavour, even for a lager. After my first couple of sips, I thought that the bar had watered it down. Iíve tried it again since - no difference. I prefer lagers with a little more body.

2.8
   AROMA 5/10   APPEARANCE 3/5   TASTE 5/10   PALATE 3/5   OVERALL 12/20
bhenry76 (101) - Landenberg, Pennsylvania, USA - OCT 16, 2001
Good bitterness but a bit sour aftertaste.

2.3
   AROMA 4/10   APPEARANCE 3/5   TASTE 4/10   PALATE 2/5   OVERALL 10/20
Indra (2711) - Suburbia, Kansas, USA - OCT 12, 2001
Re-rated. Iím not sure quite sure what I ever saw in this beer. It has to have changed somewhat dramatically, or I have...and seeing as how Iím one of those who likes almost everything...I dunno. Either way, this is a very non-special lager. Totally ordinary in basically every way. Oh, well. Thereís lots more to choose from...

3
   AROMA 5/10   APPEARANCE 3/5   TASTE 7/10   PALATE 3/5   OVERALL 12/20
legion242 (2344) - Richardson, Texas, USA - OCT 10, 2001
A nice and crisp lager. Did I say crisp?

2.6
   AROMA 5/10   APPEARANCE 3/5   TASTE 5/10   PALATE 3/5   OVERALL 10/20
MilkmanDan (1943) - Eagan, Minnesota, USA - OCT 9, 2001
Eh. Some decent bitterness, but no maltiness or tasty hops to speak of. Too mellow and thin, not enough character or body. Largely forgettable, but not actively bad.


We Want To Hear From You



Join us! RateBeer is made by beer enthusiasts for the craft beer community. Your basic membership is free and allows you to read all beer ratings. Click here to create your account... and give your opinion!

Join Us »



Page  1 « 172 173 174  175  176 177 178 » 183
Tick this beer for your profile
  • Currently 0/5 Stars.
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5