RATINGS: 43   WEIGHTED AVG: 2.37/5   EST. CALORIES: 142   ABV: 4.72%
This is the 1960s formula "authentically kraeusened" Old Style Traditional Lager that process more thoroughly ferments beer to give it additional flavor, along with a smoother finish.

Tick this beer for your profile
  • Currently 0/5 Stars.
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

   AROMA 5/10   APPEARANCE 2/5   TASTE 6/10   PALATE 2/5   OVERALL 12/20
monkeychugg55 (1082) - Joliet, Illinois, USA - JUN 27, 2009
UPDATED: JUL 15, 2009 Pours a clear yellow with a thin, fizzy, white "head" that had a small hole in the center. Within a matter of seconds I watched the hole spread and eat the rest of the head within a matter of 3 seconds or so. Now is completely decapitated. Pils malt aroma with sweet corn and faint hops. Wow. The flavor is actually not that bad. Sweet, but you can tell there are actual beer ingredients in there. It fades away as fast as the head did, in a rush of bubbles. The finish is really clean, all that is left is the feel of sweet water in your mouth and whatever you can burp up. This is a above average macro at least. Not terrible.

   AROMA 1/10   APPEARANCE 2/5   TASTE 1/10   PALATE 1/5   OVERALL 3/20
Onslow (1473) - Kalamazoo, Michigan, USA - MAY 17, 2009
Back in the early 80s I lived in Chicago. I spent a lot of time hanging out at the Step High Bar on south Wacker, drank massive amounts of Old Style (when in Rome), and consume Tombstone Pizzas that they cooked in a toaster oven behind the bar The bar was a dive but it was within walking distance of my south loop apartment (if you can call a 300 sq ft hole in the wall with the El running right outside your window an apartment.)

So Im obviously emotionally connected to this brew. Nonetheless, it really tastes like crap. Especially this Improved Flavor version. It pours pissy pale yellow with a modest white head that fizzles into nothing. Aroma is of weak corn. The flavor is oh wait, there is no flavor. Really. Maybe a hint of sweet corn or slight vegetal skank, but really the flavor is nill. Maybe this is a light beer and they forgot to put the work light on the label.

I gotta find some old Old Style before its gone, though I doubt it will be much of an improvement

   AROMA 2/10   APPEARANCE 3/5   TASTE 5/10   PALATE 3/5   OVERALL 7/20
hombrepalo (1971) - Chicago, Illinois, USA - MAY 4, 2009
KRAEUSENED! 16 oz pour into a plastic cup @ the Cubs game Saturday $6.50. Cubs 6 Marlins 1. Really nothing to drink inside the ball park. I do admit it did have more flavor than the previous Old Style. Somewhat of a saltier, sweeter taste.

   AROMA 4/10   APPEARANCE 3/5   TASTE 4/10   PALATE 2/5   OVERALL 6/20
DrnkMcDermott (3075) - Downers Grove, Illinois, USA - APR 29, 2009
Heres rating #10 that establishes the number on the shelf tag. 24 oz. can. I compared this to a 12 oz. bottle of the old stuff after finding both from Sams. Assumption is the older bottle might be a bit past code. But of the new stuff: I poured it into my Sam Adams glass and a frothy head foamed up the top half, possibly due to its wide-mouth opening. Both beer looked identical in the same glasses: pale lager yellow, a bit of gold in the thicker part of the glass. The corn smell is less pronounced here, but theres also less malt or hop smell in its place. Theres also less sweetness in the taste, but the mouthfeel is watery, something I learned after tasting this is a common complaint even among regular beer drinkers. A bit more malt comes through, and with less remaining corn, it seems more finished. Midway through, I start to get that unpleasant buzz that usually comes with trying tallboys of malt liquor. I think Id rather put this down to the psychology of drinking from a big cheap can.

   AROMA 5/10   APPEARANCE 3/5   TASTE 5/10   PALATE 3/5   OVERALL 13/20
badgerben (5065) - Blaine, Minnesota, USA - APR 26, 2009
Thanks to Skyview for sharing! Yellow color with a medium head. Light grain and corn aroma. Pretty much the same flavor. Cleanly fermented, nothing offensive at all. Certainly drinkable.

   AROMA 3/10   APPEARANCE 2/5   TASTE 5/10   PALATE 2/5   OVERALL 10/20
naivepegasus (372) - USA - APR 14, 2009
pours clear yellow with a thin, rapidly dissipating stark white soapy head. Odor of straw, pretty much what you get with the recently displaced recipe. Taste is pretty mild, very drinkable and crisp. Starts off light, ends with a pretty good dry crispness, while lacking some of the sweet aftertaste Old Style used to have. Id say its a definite improvement.

   AROMA 3/10   APPEARANCE 5/5   TASTE 6/10   PALATE 4/5   OVERALL 15/20
pulykamell (4) - USA - MAR 20, 2009 does not count
Rating for style, I think this is a solid lawnmower beer. Far better than Bud or Miller. My first sip and I was transported straight back to when I was four years old, and my dad wouldnt be able to crack open an Old Style without me begging for just one sip. If its not the same flavor as the Old Style of yesteryear, its pretty damn close. Compared to regular Old Style, its got a drier, less sweet finish. If I have to drink light American adjunct macrobrew lagers, this is my go-to beer.

   AROMA 6/10   APPEARANCE 3/5   TASTE 6/10   PALATE 3/5   OVERALL 11/20
FunkyBrewster (1518) - Chicago, Illinois, USA - MAR 15, 2009
UPDATED: AUG 31, 2011 Here goes, lets taste the new and improved Old Style. Color and aroma same as before. Pale straw color with little or no head. Aroma of grains, wet dog, malt and bread. Flavor is slightly improved, and I mean slightly. It is still a lot of grain and malt and water and maybe just a hint smoother in the finish. Id love to have one of each side by side as I am using memory to compare and memory is usually something I dont keep when consuming Old Style. The finish is the only real improvement and that isnt saying too much. So I give it one more point in flavor and thats about it. Dont get this beer and expect a big change, just a slight modification. Going to have to try it again later next to an old one if possible, that might help me detect the change a bit more

   AROMA 2/10   APPEARANCE 1/5   TASTE 2/10   PALATE 2/5   OVERALL 4/20
IlanMan (1015) - Appleton, Wisconsin, USA - FEB 5, 2009
Light yellow pour. Aroma of rice crispness and light malt. Thin body with a very crisp flavor of rice and very dry malt. Not real good. Slightly fresher than the newer old style but still a solid suck factor.

   AROMA 2/10   APPEARANCE 2/5   TASTE 5/10   PALATE 3/5   OVERALL 11/20
pkbites (916) - Milwaukee, Wisconsin, USA - FEB 4, 2009
UPDATED: MAR 20, 2009 Is that 4.1% alcohol content correct? Says who? Why would kraeusening lower the ABV content by 20%? The old version had an ABV of 5%. What the hell? This looks the same as the old version: light corn water, little aroma, thick white head that dies quickly. Lots of carbonation.The Kraeusened isnt as sweet as the old stuff. Its also much, MUCH smoother. The lower alcohol level is disappointing, though. ***************************************** contacting the brewer Ive had the alcohol content corrected. The correct ABV is 4.72%

We Want To Hear From You

Join us! RateBeer is made by beer enthusiasts for the craft beer community. Your basic membership is free and allows you to read all beer ratings. Click here to create your account... and give your opinion!

Join Us »

Page  1 2 3  4  5
Tick this beer for your profile
  • Currently 0/5 Stars.
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5