HarmonKill-a-Brew (407) - Wilmar, Arkansas, USA - MAY 28, 2006
If I had wanted crappy tasting American light beer, I would have bought crappy tasting American light beer... and saved about 2 bucks a six pack. I actually like regular Heineken ok but this stuff is not worth bothering with. bigrond (1499) - factoryville, Pennsylvania, USA - MAY 27, 2006
I always thought that Amstel was their light beer, ubt it was being served at a party - when in Rome.... no big surprise - I knew it would suck! luckygirl (1222) - Boulder, Colorado, USA - MAY 23, 2006
And to wash down that Bare Knuckle Stout...sheeesh. Beer was a clear light yellow-gold color with an average, white, frothy mostly and quickly diminishing head. The aroma was pretty much a bath of moderate DMS notes. A rest from the swirling allows for some light notes of toasted grain, trace herbal hop and dough, miscellaneous notes of honey and mellon. The flavor was lightly sweet, moderately acidic and trace bitter with a short corny-husky finish. Aftertaste was stale dry Cheerios. The body was light, the texture was watery and the carbonation was lively. SudsMcDuff (8488) - .....Manchester United.........., Texas, USA - MAY 22, 2006
this isn’t bladdy bad at all...its really like the original version, but not, just alittle weaker in the skunkiness, blind taste test could be intresting but not bad at all and i’d buy it more but to expensive like regular heiny. every one fuckin sucks, its a light heineken, but this is a snobber factory so why even write this. Ernest (7815) - Boulder, Colorado, USA - MAY 21, 2006
Bottle, LaGuardia airport, NYC.
Head is initially small, fizzy, white, mostly diminishing.
Body is clear light yellow.
Aroma is lightly malty (grain, bread), lightly hoppy (herbs), with a note of DMS.
Flavor is lightly sweet, lightly bitter.
Finish is lightly to moderately bitter.
Light body, watery texture, fizzy carbonation.
Looks like this has gotten around the States more quickly than expected. Can’t say that it’s anything more than what can be expected from the name "Heineken Light".
BeerBlockaid (683) - Brooklyn, New York, USA - MAY 13, 2006
So I guess Heiny finally jumped on this "Light" bandwagon. Guiness probably still has fewer calories. It’s like sushi, only you have to drink more to even feel full. mmmmmm sushi. Well went out last night and they had this. This or the normal big beers. Drank from bottle. Front what I could tell, the "Light" took out the skunky taste, that "light" gives beer’s in green bottles. the later light being from light *bulbs.* ja ja nein nein? Anywho, still smelt kinda skunky. Really crisp, watered down corn malts taste, and if you have had Amstel light, it’s pretty much the same. Maybe a bit more fresh. It’s interesting the cities they chose to test this stuff. patrick767 (4123) - fort wayne, Indiana, USA - MAY 11, 2006
bottle - Well, it smells like almost nothing. It looks like any other pale lager. The flavor has the typical light hoppiness of European lagers. It’s thin and watery. It tastes like a Heineken with extra water. Surprise, surprise. Oddly enough that still makes it better than quite a few macrobrew pale lagers. gulfster1981 (1) - Pensacola, Florida, USA - MAY 10, 2006 does not count
I think this is just a stategy to get some of the light drinkers(the carb watchers). I always thought Amstel light was the heineken light. but what do I know
gsmitty80 (2130) - Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, USA - MAY 9, 2006
Watered down Heineken. I mean not bad if your on a diet or a woman is all i say with these beers. locarboy (129) - USA - MAY 7, 2006
UPDATED: MAY 12, 2006 New, so I thought I would try it. Not worth the price. No skunk like the regular. Thin flavor, grainy and a hint of sweetness. Water has fewer calories, fewer carbs and almost as much flavor. And just what is horizontal fermentation anyway? and does it make better beer? If so, I would hate to taste the vertically fermented Heineken Light. I guess I could sum this beer up by saying that it is vertically challenged.