Braudog (6763) - Yorktown, Virginia, USA - NOV 27, 2003
UPDATED: JUN 2, 2004 Poured like your standard American beer. This has a malty aroma. They have balls calling this a "pale ale". This is Miller Lite! Vaguely citric, but intensely malty. Don't think there's a single hop in it. AKA Henry's Ale Sham (1844) - Seattle, Washington, USA - NOV 6, 2003
Pours a very pale gold with a white foamy head that is disappearing quickly leaving a bit of lace. Musky malt aroma with small hops. Pretty much the same with the flavor but a bit more muted. A nice cleansing palate. Reid (2558) - Salem, Oregon, USA - NOV 1, 2003
bought in a green glass 12 oz bottle..with boar on label ( beer was not skunky despite colour of glass).
What can i say this beer is average..bland even but is drinkable.
Not Weinhards best beer but ok if all you have to choose is Bud or Coors i would go for this.
Its called a pale ale but looks abd tases like a pilsner/lager, also says "ireland style" on the label strange indeed :).
But all in all not an offensive brew..just average LOL.
AlabastorJones (814) - Seattle, Washington, USA - OCT 26, 2003
Looks like piss, complete with the thin white head. Smells like a thin lager, subtle hints of banana,non existant finish, the more henry Weinhard's I try, the more respect I lose for them. Rock $ Roll McDonalds. DiamondD (38) - Sammamish, Washington, USA - OCT 25, 2003
This is a lager not a pale ale.I used to drink this as a quality alternative to budweiser in the early 90's. I really enjoyed it then and I really enjoyed it today. Even though I have haven't had it in 10 years. I've been drinking alot of micro-brews. I've had alot of high quality
beers since then.Yet this one is still very quaffable. Moosehead and Heineken are very similar. Both lagers.
jstu9 (402) - Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, USA - JUN 9, 2003
(bottle) I had a Henry Weinhard's Pale Ale. Since no other Pale Ale is listed under Henry Weinhard, I'm guessing this is the same. Anyways, this is a slight step up from the Budweisers of the world, but not by much. I'll give it a nice rating for aroma though. Ernest (7723) - Boulder, Colorado, USA - MAY 20, 2003
Head is initially average sized, frothy, off-white, mostly diminishing. Body is clear medium yellow. Aroma is lightly malty (grain, light bread), lightly hoppy (flowers, lemon), with a note of DMS. Flavor is moderately sweet, lightly acidic, lightly bitter. Finish is lightly sweet, lightly acidic, lightly bitter, slightly unclean. Light to medium body, watery texture, fizzy carbonation, metallic. Plenty of DMS and an unclean flavor, letting you know this has been micturated upon by an evil giant. celogan (204) - Oroville, California, USA - MAR 28, 2003
Not too bad for a macro brew. Nice head that hung around longer than some, but dissappeared in a short time. Adquate Carbonation. Aroma wasn't bad, color was nice and had at least some taste.
I wouldn't seek this out, but it's not bad at all; good thirst quencher. Got this from a beer trading buddy at work, so I don't know if it's worth the price or not. If it's cheap; I'd say it is worth a try at least. Aubrey (3516) - Bellingham, Washington, USA - MAR 5, 2003
UPDATED: JAN 18, 2006 Very clear and pale yellow ... headless. Corny nose. Thin and watery texture. Malts were reminiscent of wet bread with honey and a little DMS on top. Ripe apple notes were nice, albeit subdued. No head, but rather carbonated mouthfeel ... a little chewy, too. Finish was dry and relatively lifeless. A few seconds later, in the aftertaste, some bitterness (with a hint of toast) surfaced. Not quite enough to balance things out, though. Yawn. harlequinn (2744) - Tacoma, Washington, USA - JAN 20, 2003
I did not like it the first time I tried it, but after the 2nd and 3rd time it is not bad stuff and it is cheap.