tmc90 (17) - BELGIUM - JUL 16, 2009
Very little flavour and quite watery in texture too, certainly nothing complicated going on here. For the same reason I can’t really say it was unpleasent in any way either. BTetlow (7) - BALLARAT, AUSTRALIA - DEC 29, 2004 does not count
UPDATED: APR 10, 2009 Very pale in colour and quite cloudy (in the bits floating in it kind of way)
Tastes a little like its stuck between styles lager/Trappist Ale, and failed on both.
Too sweet for a lager and not challenging enough for a Trappist.
Definately quite watery, but the sweetness there was of a very faint bitter orange and honey.
A little too dry on the end. Aron_lj (2) - Oostende, BELGIUM - AUG 16, 2012 does not count
Nice freshness. Gold appearence. Nice with foam on top. I prefer this beer on warm days. Serve very cold. And i recommend a chilled glass to serve it in. I think this beer deserves a better rating. Recently the brewery changed something and the taste is mutch better then before. hckyfi77 (2) - NETHERLANDS - MAR 26, 2009 does not count
No taste, no aroma, no head. Very light color. It’s not dreadful, but it’s called Campus Premium for a reason. Brunhilde (1) - Melbourne, AUSTRALIA - APR 15, 2006 does not count
I actually tipped this down the sink, and those wierd floaties scared me...