Atheist_Peace (981) - Halifax, Nova Scotia, CANADA - NOV 12, 2010
341ml bottle. A little light in colour for a porter - about the colour of watered down coke with a light tan head that leaves very little lace. Slight coffee nose with some underlying hops and a hint of spice but it all seems out of balance. Tastes more like cola and coffee poured together with notes of chocolate fading in and out and a weird funk through the finish, but slightly interesting. mmacleod75 (112) - Ontario, CANADA - OCT 24, 2010
Poured nice dark brown with very little head. Malty aroma with coffee hints, and slightly sweet. Malt flavor with roastiness, coffee with a mild hoppy finish. Since it is a porter, I was expecting a more robust and complex flavor, but it seemed to me more like a strong brown ale. It was good, and I enjoyed it, but I guess I was expecting more. chronictonic (472) - Oreland, Pennsylvania, USA - AUG 26, 2010
Medium brown in color with small tan head. Aroma is a bit off - slightly metallic. Flavor initially is sweet and malty - definitely a brown porter and not a robust porter. Finishes crisp and slightly hoppy. Not bad for an English style porter. wilderthanyou (758) - Guelph, CANADA - JUN 22, 2010
As a beer, its really not to bad, but as a porter, its kind of a fail. The aroma is mild, and lager like, but with light notes of coffee and roastiness, It kind of smells like they had a lager, but added roasted malts for the colour more than anything. The flavor again, is a little better, starts out smooth, coffee, burnt chocolate, roastiness, bitter, a little on the soapy side, but not too bad. The mouth feel is watery for porter.
Really not very porter like, but drinkable, and tasty enough to remain interesting. But the soapy finish would make this beer and unlikely candidate for a session ale. williamherbert (1546) - Syracuse, New York, USA - APR 28, 2010
07/2007, known as Porter 68: The color is a deep mahogany red. There is a rocky cardboard-brown head. It’s not altogether thick, really. Some glassy depth to the look of it.
Has a really pleasant, deep and dark berry smell with just that hint of coffee. The coffee smell is milder than most porters, and that’s not a bad thing. Has a good mix of both sweet and bitter. Nice cherry, really nice.
The taste comes across much more bitter than the smell. The sweet cherry/berry is only an accent. The coffee comes through a lot stronger in the taste than in the smell. It does sweeten as it warms.
The feel is bitter on the tongue. Not real thick but creamy enough. It’s actually relatively smooth for a porter; doesn’t have the usual sandpaper viscosity. Pleasant, not thick or dry. The drink overall is thin but pleasant. It’s bitter first, sweet second. Really easy to drink.
jimmay (807) - Waterloo, Ontario, CANADA - FEB 9, 2010
341 ml bottle from brewery. Pours dark brown with red tinges, small cappucino coloured head. Not a tonne of aroma, but nice sweet malty taste. Pretty good! philbertk (1873) - Seattle, Washington, USA - JAN 28, 2010
Sleeman Brewing & Malting Company, Ltd.--Porter 68*--2006 Release--11.5 oz. Bottle--5.50% ABV--30 IBU’s? (4.0 / 5.0) Porter. Mild lacy tan head. Clear thin dark bronze red color. Mild burnt hop front. Smooth mild dry sweet crusty biscuit thin roasted toffee black cherry body. Crisp odd mild tangy clean hop end. Well made. Sampled 5/25/2006. SanfordBrewer (1608) - Sanford, Florida, USA - DEC 20, 2009
(br-btl cm/rd-lbl(neck only), Sleeman Brewing & Malting Co, 9¢/oz)drowland (8939) - Georgia, USA - AUG 21, 2009
lct-br, thin-tan-head, patchy-lace, med-body, ^co2.
bready alchl aroma, sweet-chclt-malt §chrcl T1 chclt-malt §leafy-hop T2 chrd-malt T3.
too^-co2, too-thin, needs more bitter and aroma hops, fairly drinkable, not bad or special.
Got this on a whim from a mix-6... wasn’t impressed at all by this guy. Boring and bland for a porter for sure. Rciesla (5499) - Exit 15W, New Jersey, USA - JUN 29, 2009
Bottle, porter #68. Pours a dark brown body with a large tan head. Sweet malty body with a lighter acrid acid malt character. Malty with some light coco and minerals. Eh its a miss.