No Score 

more ratings

RATINGS: 5   MEAN: 2.26/5.0   WEIGHTED AVG: 2.53/5   EST. CALORIES: 150   ABV: 5%
Malty and unpredictable, our El Rey Blond Lager possesses an appealingly subtle texture. A tart wheat and rye presence at the back of the mouth is tasty but fades quickly. A weet grain mouth-feel underpins it all, highlighted with a bit of a slight hoppy edge to make things livelier. Not a too light nor too heavy Premium American Pilsner thatís compatible with any type of food.

Tick this beer for your profile
  • Currently 0/5 Stars.
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Most RecentTicked By

   AROMA 5/10   APPEARANCE 3/5   TASTE 6/10   PALATE 2/5   OVERALL 10/20
Lubiere (13557) - Ottawa, Ontario, CANADA - OCT 3, 2009
A blonde to gold ale with a thin white head. In aroma, light malts, with adjunct and mineral notes. In mouth, again, that lightly peated malt with light hops, light bodied. On tap at brewpub, August 27 2009.

   AROMA 4/10   APPEARANCE 3/5   TASTE 4/10   PALATE 3/5   OVERALL 12/20
bhensonb (14895) - Woodland, California, USA - AUG 31, 2009
Tap at the brewpub. Pale gold with a slight white head. Near medium body. LIght citrus/floral aroma. Flavor is light malt with light hop. Clean finish.

   AROMA 5/10   APPEARANCE 3/5   TASTE 3/10   PALATE 2/5   OVERALL 10/20
marcus (9992) - Sacramento, California, USA - AUG 31, 2009
On tap at the brewery. This blonde ale poured with a decent white head and a floral aroma. There is a flat watery malt flavor and little else.

   AROMA 3/10   APPEARANCE 3/5   TASTE 3/10   PALATE 3/5   OVERALL 5/20
kp (10882) - Woodstock, Georgia, USA - AUG 9, 2009

Name: El Ray Blonde Lager
Date: July 12, 2009
Mode: Draft
Source: Brewpub
Appearance: hazy gold, fine beige head, drippy lace
Aroma: light sweet malt aroma, light floral hops
Flavor: sweet malt flavor, faint bitterness
Aroma: 3/10; Appearance: 6/10; Flavor: 3/10; Palate: 5/10; Overall: 5/20
Rating: 1.7/5.0
Drinkability: 6/10
Score: 4

   AROMA 4/10   APPEARANCE 3/5   TASTE 4/10   PALATE 2/5   OVERALL 8/20
GG (2332) - NorCal, California, USA - OCT 4, 2007
To be honest, this isnít a poorly made beer. I mean, there arenít any defects apparent (or at least that I could taste, aside from the astringent factor). The problem that itís a boring lager. Nothing outside the scale of Budweiser or Coors. Aroma is nil. Couldnít get anything from the aroma, no matter how hard I tried. Appearance was a nice, clear golden color, nice head. Mouthfeel was thin, watery. Flavor was..again...nil. Almost waterlike in fact, but like the Wheat beer they make this too had a strange mouth puckinger astringency to it. According to the description, itís supposed to be there. So that alone makes it different. Not better, necessarily. But different.

We Want To Hear From You

Join us! RateBeer is made by beer enthusiasts for the craft beer community. Your basic membership is free and allows you to read all beer ratings. Click here to create your account... and give your opinion!

Join Us »

Tick this beer for your profile
  • Currently 0/5 Stars.
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5