overall
1
24
style
Brewed by Labatt Breweries (AB InBev)
Style: Pale Lager
London, Canada

bottling
unknown

on tap
available

Regional Distribution

Add Distribution Data
RATINGS: 472   WEIGHTED AVG: 1.85/5   EST. CALORIES: 120   ABV: 4%
COMMERCIAL DESCRIPTION
Crisp, clean and delicately balanced in its flavour delivery. A hint of aromatic hop with slight sweetness and fruity character.

A tick is a star rating
  • Currently 0/5 Stars.
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5


1.2
Perdue46 (68) - USA - SEP 22, 2002
I was not pleased with this beer at all. It was skunky and expensive. ....

3.8
stillplaya3199 (14) - USA - AUG 30, 2002
a lighter version of my fav labatt blue good light beer.....................

0.8
dhurtubise (568) - Hamilton, Ontario, CANADA - AUG 30, 2002
You have to excuse this beer and because on both sides of its lineage - brewery and style - it comes from a long line of understated, boring and unimaginative beers. The funniest thing is how the light beer brewers all fight to try and say the others taste like water - well they're all correct. If you want a light beer that tastes great try something from the dry irish stout style: Guinness, Beamish or maybe even Murphy's.

3
Inveigler (371) - Ferndale, Michigan, USA - AUG 28, 2002
My favorite American style lager. Thin with just a touch of maltiness. Lightly hopped and eminently thirst-quenchable. My beer of choice for most outdoor activities and for session drinking.

2.7
PorterPounder (8364) - Tallahassee, Florida, USA - AUG 11, 2002
Better than most American Lights - even better than regular Blue. Worth buying if on sale.

2.1
Pjones6738 (500) - Madison, Wisconsin, USA - JUL 25, 2002
Typical American light beer. Simple inoffensive taste. Had a couple while visiting with friends, and the fact that I was drinking never crossed my mind. To me, that means that its bland, but not bad.

2.8
DEbeer (192) - West Virginia, USA - JUL 18, 2002
This is pretty drinkable, but the taste is almost nonexistent. If I had to have a light beer (which I hope I never do) I would probably choose this one.

1.8
ClarkVV (6963) - Boston, Massachusetts, USA - JUL 10, 2002
UPDATED: JAN 24, 2004 i like this beer in bottles. tastes good to me for some reason. Cereal grains are masked by the lightness. Not quite as crisp as id like. Good for 5.99 12 pack and much better than natty or busch. still a bad beer by all means though.

0.5
MartinT (10155) - Montreal, Quebec, CANADA - JUL 6, 2002
Shit or light shit is still shit............................................

2.2
DougShoemaker (3146) - Toronto, Ontario, CANADA - JUL 5, 2002
Mild sweet aroma, pale yellow, fluffy head. So light almost no flavour save for the bitterness. Well carbonated, ordinary.


We Want To Hear From You



Join us! RateBeer is made by beer enthusiasts for the craft beer community. Your basic membership is free and allows you to read all beer ratings. Click here to create your account... and give your opinion!

Join Us »



Page  1 « 40 41 42  43  44 45 46 » 49
A tick is a star rating
  • Currently 0/5 Stars.
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5