Cutlass (51) - Galloway, Ohio, USA - MAR 2, 2002
UPDATED: MAR 10, 2005 its okay. doesnt have any of full-strength Blue’s flavor. I really don’t see a purpose for this beer since I never thought full-strength Blue was heavy to begin with. Volgon (2763) - Manchester, New Hampshire, USA - FEB 7, 2002
UPDATED: JUN 1, 2004 Holy mother of God, this is bad. To add insult to injury, this comes in a 11.5 OZ bottle. Fizzy light yellow, strange plastic aroma, watery mouthfeel and taste. LuckeyHaskins99 (180) - Toledo, Ohio, USA - FEB 7, 2002
Ugh! I’ve had it so you don’t have to. One of the worst ’light versions’ of a popular beer ever. In fact MGD light is better than this stuff. SpecialBrew99 (57) - grand blanc, Michigan, USA - FEB 5, 2002
Although it is a mass produced beer, i really enjoy this. Of all the mass produced, i think this, coors and michelob are the top. Good to drink a lot of them and not get a horrible headache. LuckySmarms99 (80) - Ontario, USA - FEB 5, 2002
Similar to Blue, but have to drink more to feel it. Light beer, and prefer this over the regular blue in the summer. BLUE = Winter, BLUE LIGHT = Summer.
darkvibe (68) - Rochester, New York, USA - FEB 1, 2002
Tastes ok. I like it better than Blue. johnson2020 (79) - Canton, Michigan, USA - JAN 13, 2002
Better than it’s non-light brother, but barely.
Dougan (93) - Charlottetown, Prince Edward Island, CANADA - JAN 11, 2002
I have no idea why these light beers are even on here. Not tough at all! labattblueleaf (225) - Grand Rapids, Michigan, USA - JAN 10, 2002
I’m not a fan of light beer in general (except Bud). This is just a diet version of the classic ’Blue’. dewolfpack (59) - Petit De Grat, Nova Scotia, CANADA - JAN 2, 2002
You should have stuck to the full bodied flavor of the regular BLUE