overall
7
60
style
Brewed by Labatt Breweries (AB InBev)
Style: Pale Lager
London, Canada

bottling
unknown

on tap
unknown

distribution
unknown

Add Distribution Data
RATINGS: 41   WEIGHTED AVG: 2.18/5   EST. CALORIES: 150   ABV: 5%
COMMERCIAL DESCRIPTION
Features a full body and taste with the Saaz hops countering much of the bitterness associated with traditional lagers.

A tick is a star rating
  • Currently 0/5 Stars.
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5


1.8
collieman (191) - montreal, Quebec, CANADA - MAR 9, 2006
wanted to try this for a while, and I’m dissapointed. I refiuse to belive that this is "unchanged in recepie since the 1800’s" as this tastes, much like okeef does now, like a very modern beer with just a splash of old world flavor in it. And it’s not realy a hoppy taste anyways, it’s a little maltyer. That’s it that’s all. Overall Nice, light, plesant taste of light malt, medium high carbonation, and a lingering skunky aftertaste. Everything but the aftertaste screams out lawnmower beer. Cheers. {oh ps, I think if this is the unchanged way it tasted back when it was created, I CAN belive it was labat’s first lager ever, seing as they still can’t seem to get it right. Cheers}

2.1
MarshallMac (143) - West Vancouver, British Columbia, CANADA - NOV 6, 2002
I've had this once, on saturday, walking down to the rooster, steve had one from the blue fridge and brock and i split it. it tasted just like any old labatt lager. good luck

1.8
pondoshuffles (141) - Fitzroy Harbour, Ontario, CANADA - NOV 8, 2003
A macro lager with a little flavour to it. If there's Saaz hops in it, I can't really find them. A good alternative to Blue.

0.8
Gooner (136) - Chatham, Ontario, CANADA - DEC 21, 2001
CCI beer. Ha! Ha! :) This is the archetype of the worst American macrobrew. Too bad Canada had to claim victory.

1.1
chainman (104) - Ontario, CANADA - JUN 7, 2006
Someone told me this stuff was like 50 and Blue mixed together...if that were true, I wouldn’t hate this beer so much. Bland, boring, and not really any better than Blue, just different in a gross way. Not surprising that even old men don’t buy this anymore. You’re better off getting Lucky Lager, as there’s barely a difference.

4.1
markymark (82) - Duluth, Minnesota, USA - DEC 21, 2002
UPDATED: JAN 14, 2003 I was skeptical at first since I always saw yokels drink this at the bar. However, a very decent, clean, crisp tasting lager from Labatt"s. I enjoy it.

1.9
LuckySmarms99 (80) - Ontario, USA - FEB 5, 2002
Didn't think much of it when at school. Tried it only a few times (well 24 actually) Never again.

2.5
Brewmaster88 (53) - Petrolia, Ontario, CANADA - DEC 7, 2002
UPDATED: DEC 15, 2004 An average lager from Labatt’s. Very easy to drink in large quantities. Very clean and crisp.

2.4
Chevboy (37) - Millgrove, Ontario, CANADA - JAN 22, 2003
Tastes the same as Blue to me...............................................

1.9
beerlover79 (35) - st. catharines, Ontario, CANADA - OCT 17, 2007
one of the most refreshing beers i have ever had, great with hot wings or pizza, a bit expensive,easy drinking, but nice subtle taste and clean finish, nice colour and average head, light corn smell. this beer lives up to its name, just to price


We Want To Hear From You



Join us! RateBeer is made by beer enthusiasts for the craft beer community. Your basic membership is free and allows you to read all beer ratings. Click here to create your account... and give your opinion!

Join Us »



Page  1 2 3  4  5
A tick is a star rating
  • Currently 0/5 Stars.
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5


tags


#saaz