overall
34
49
style
Brewed by Löwenbräu Munich (InBev)
Style: Dunkel/Tmavý
Munich, Germany

bottling
unknown

on tap
unknown

distribution
unknown

Add Distribution Data
RATINGS: 76   WEIGHTED AVG: 2.97/5   EST. CALORIES: 150   ABV: 5%
COMMERCIAL DESCRIPTION
Lowenbrau Dark is brewed in accordance with the Reinheitsgebot, the German purity law of 1516, which stipulates that only the natural ingredients of barley-malt, hops, yeast and water be used in the brewing process

A tick is a star rating
  • Currently 0/5 Stars.
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5


3.9
Kevbo99 (149) - Dunmore, Pennsylvania, USA - OCT 20, 2002
Not a rush of flavor but still deserves a lil credit........................

3
beerguy101 (5364) - Newark, California, USA - SEP 26, 2002
Dark brown color, medium head. Nice malted, slightly roasted malts, some malt sweetness. Good hop balance. Nice flavor, perhaps a little mild? . Mouthfeel is full. The “original Munich formula”. A change from the Lowenbrau of a few years ago. Very nice. Finish is clean and smooth. Aftertaste is malty, slightly bitter.

3.1
Ringo (963) - Loveland, Colorado, USA - SEP 26, 2002
This is a better than average beer, especially given the price. I haven't tried it since they stopped brewing it in the USA, but I will be on the lookout for some of the Munich-brewed stuff.

2.1
Aesir (130) - Tustin, California, USA - AUG 20, 2002
A below average dark beer. Not that bad, but why settle for less? Surely not good enough to Lower my Brow. BAHAHAHAHAHHAHA!!!!1111

3.2
vwsteggie (684) - Paxton, Massachusetts, USA - AUG 9, 2002
Not a bad dark beer, but not for being a German beer from Canada. No offence to Canadians, but when I want a German beer I hope that it was brewed in Germany. Anyway, the smell reminds me of baked beans and it is not really bitter at all. Overall not a bad beer.

1.5
benzim (36) - USA - JUL 12, 2002
Decent dark lager. This was the first dark I ever tried, back in the early 80s when it was brewed by Miller. I could barely finish it then! It was too exotic for me. Recently tried the Canadian brewed version and found it to be not bad at all.

2.8
beerlovinman99 (124) - USA - JUL 9, 2002
Geez, I remember when this was the extent of exotic beers at my local liquor store. It's really not a bad beer, but it's really too sweet for continued drinking.

2.8
SJP (483) - Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, USA - JUN 28, 2002
Not too bad. It's another dark lager from Germany (by way of Cananda for me though) that tastes a lot like Becks or St. Pauli dark. Mild caramel flavor and a very thin texture. Not so bad to avoid, but I won't be running out to get more.

3
bluemeow76 (693) - Lewis Center, Ohio, USA - MAY 30, 2002
Not bad, certainly better than I expected, but still nothing to write home about.

3
Dogbrick (13789) - Columbus, Ohio, USA - MAY 28, 2002
I would classify this as a Schwarzbier or a Munich Dunkel, although it is definitely not up to par with most of either variety. This is a very unobtrusive brew, but it needs more of a kick to be anything special. Mild malty flavor, very dark with a minimal head and lacing.


We Want To Hear From You



Join us! RateBeer is made by beer enthusiasts for the craft beer community. Your basic membership is free and allows you to read all beer ratings. Click here to create your account... and give your opinion!

Join Us »



Page  1 2 3 4 5  6  7 8 9
A tick is a star rating
  • Currently 0/5 Stars.
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5