RATINGS: 366   WEIGHTED AVG: 2.98/5   IBU: 28   EST. CALORIES: 144   ABV: 4.8%
COMMERCIAL DESCRIPTION
Fat Angel, rest his soul, had a complex palate that balances the rich pleasures of malt with the crisp refreshing flavor of hops with a finish that is fresh and clean. Eminently drinkable, Fat Angel brought divergent tastes together to create a satisfyingly smooth harmony.

A tick is a star rating
  • Currently 0/5 Stars.
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5


2.9
smashteroid (262) - Alabama, USA - MAR 30, 2008
Glad I got to try it on tap at the brewery in Burlington before it was retired, even though it wasn’t really a great beer. Anyway, it was served cold on tap. Poured medium brown and had an aroma of...I don’t know, it was actually really weak. You could taste the hops alright but the malts weren’t all that present. It was an okay beer but certainly not Magic Hat’s best. It won’t be sorely missed.

2.9
BREWMUSKCLES (2729) - New Jersey, USA - MAR 28, 2008
altogeather it was refreshing lightly hoppy and a bit watery. with adequate tastes it was decent. the malt was ok i guess and the beer was a weak interpretation of some of the good qualities of a pale ale (for an american brewer. for an english brewer it was quite flavorful and quite enjoyable for the lack of sweetness +2 points for that!)

3.2
Outchillen (29) - Pennsylvania, USA - MAR 11, 2008
Similar to the #9but not fruity. amber color with white head, hopy and has a great aroma. Magic hats best beer

3.4
newbrewguy (145) - Mechanicsville, Maryland, USA - MAR 10, 2008
To me this is very much like #9, with more complexity and a little stronger hop notes. Tastes like a pale ale with, hints of spice & orange. Overall a decent beer sorry to see it’s being retired.

2.4
BEERGUY007 (206) - Scotia, New York, USA - MAR 5, 2008
You know, it was alright but not my favorite. 12 ounce bottle. Poured a medium dark brown if that makes sense. Not alot of head, no real lacing. Some hops, didn’t really get the malt. It was alright but not the best. Maybe it should be retired.

2.9
SoBloHero (56) - Buffalo, New York, USA - MAR 5, 2008
It had a decent color and aroma but failed to get my attention as I drank it. It was mediocre and nothing seemed to make me think about it while I drank it.

2.7
rlgk (18852) - Göteborg, SWEDEN - MAR 3, 2008
Bottle. orange color, offwhite head. Quite weak aroma. Fruity hoppy flavor but really not that much to taste in it.

2.9
jefcon (1921) - Arlington, Virginia, USA - FEB 17, 2008
Just a general comment on this one -- it’s so light and smooth that it nearly gets away with its lack of substance. Truthfully, this beer is probably not as bad is its rating, but for folks looking for a nice bitter English ale, they will not find much in common with the Brit lines of the same style.

3.1
Aaron19 (6) - montville, New Jersey, USA - FEB 1, 2008 does not count
Very smooth with an interesting light color.... very refreshing ice cold. A nice pale ale that is almost too easily consumable.

2.9
Davin (48) - Vermont, USA - JAN 25, 2008
UPDATED: JAN 26, 2008 This beer is an English pale ale but the hopping is spicy rather than earthy. Dry finish, clean taste. Not the best.


We Want To Hear From You



Join us! RateBeer is made by beer enthusiasts for the craft beer community. Your basic membership is free and allows you to read all beer ratings. Click here to create your account... and give your opinion!

Join Us »



Page  1 2 3  4  5 6 7 » 37
A tick is a star rating
  • Currently 0/5 Stars.
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5