ben4321 (6506) - Hoboken, New Jersey, USA - JUL 1, 2009
I have almost no recollection of this one at all, but I do have an old rating siting here, so I’ll add it to RB...
Beardface (1517) - Eugene, Oregon, USA - APR 29, 2009
Old Rating: Tastes like Michelob but a different color
Basically tastes exactly the same as the regular Michelob except that you get a hint of dark malts in the aroma and flavor. Still subpar, still better than most A-B products. BlackDonald (1126) - Gulf Shores, Alabama, USA - AUG 8, 2008
So they take a regular Michelob, take some caramel malt and burn it to a crisp, added it to the Michelob recipe and hence you have Michelob Dark. This sucks, don’t waste your time if you are reading this. daknole (11049) - Scottsdale, Arizona, USA - JUN 11, 2008
UPDATED: AUG 31, 2009 What did they do, take a regular Mich and add some dirty socks to it? NASTY. Malty and grainy. Not worth the effort. seriously. ROGUE (2215) - Lewes, Delaware, USA - FEB 13, 2008
Ooops, somebody made a mistake and burnt the Michelob so they bottled and gave it a new label. Tada!
badfinger (55) - Washington, USA - DEC 14, 2007
better than the regular, not terrible for a mass produced dark beer, but not good either Pyobon (1402) - Sydney, AUSTRALIA - DEC 6, 2007
Bottle (355ml - 5.2%, but bought in Taipei) Clear brown, with a bit of off-white head that doesn’t stay around. Unpleasant aroma of vegetables with some malt. Watery, lightly carbonated palate. Taste is pretty dreadful: very thin to start with a bit of malt sweetness with a nasty burnt malt finish. rcasta (864) - EL SALVADOR - OCT 8, 2007
this beer is a good attempt at making a different beer with some personality. i can’t find it often but haven’t looked much either fro2218 (471) - Atlanta, Georgia, USA - SEP 28, 2007
Yuck, this is just michelob with food coloring. Maybe some burnt malt in this one. prosqtor (408) - Appleton, Wisconsin, USA - AUG 6, 2007
Smells like a Mick, tastes like a Mick that was burnt on the way to the lauter tun.