overall
4
45
style
RATINGS: 122   WEIGHTED AVG: 2.06/5   EST. CALORIES: 141   ABV: 4.7%
COMMERCIAL DESCRIPTION
Introduced in 1991 and distributed in select U.S. markets. Unique bottle and can packaging features exclusive faceted edges.

Tick this beer for your profile
  • Currently 0/5 Stars.
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5


1.7
   AROMA 3/10   APPEARANCE 2/5   TASTE 4/10   PALATE 2/5   OVERALL 6/20
stegosaurus (1882) - Levittown, Pennsylvania, USA - JUL 12, 2005
pours pale golden, typical macro-brew aroma with a llittle spice, i think this beer is just a premium budweiser, taste is ok, some sweetness, body is watery.

2
   AROMA 3/10   APPEARANCE 2/5   TASTE 4/10   PALATE 2/5   OVERALL 9/20
SkyinBrian (430) - Saint Louis, Missouri, USA - JUL 11, 2005
on tap. a very sweet macro lager, maybe the sweetest ive had, but nothing offensive. i cant figure out why this is a michelob brand though instead of bud or busch. this, of course begs the question, do you really need bud, bud light, and this on tap in the same place with bud, budlight, bud select, mich ultra. this, and also all the miller products in bottles. ok, sorry for getting off course but i dont think anyone is reading this anyway.

2.3
   AROMA 3/10   APPEARANCE 3/5   TASTE 6/10   PALATE 2/5   OVERALL 9/20
KUEric (968) - Scottsdale, Arizona, USA - MAY 9, 2005
UPDATED: FEB 23, 2006 I thought this was pretty good actually. HAd it at the AB brewery tour. I gues its only distributed in the great lakes area (WI, IL, MI, etc.) ... so those who rated from elsewhere either rated the wrong beer or had on travels. I was pleasently suprised by this beer though and actually liked it. I t was a good looking pale straw colored beer. Thought the taste was somewhat rich (keep in mind considering its a pale lager and a macro at that).

0.5
   AROMA 1/10   APPEARANCE 1/5   TASTE 1/10   PALATE 1/5   OVERALL 1/20
DougiePhiTau (99) - USA - APR 9, 2005
American pale lager that is a little overated soem taste to it but overall a boring semi hoppy beer

1.7
   AROMA 3/10   APPEARANCE 2/5   TASTE 4/10   PALATE 1/5   OVERALL 7/20
Bigsky66 (148) - Eau Claire, Wisconsin, USA - FEB 22, 2005
Not bad for its kind. There seems to be a touch of caramal. Some taste too!

0.9
   AROMA 1/10   APPEARANCE 2/5   TASTE 2/10   PALATE 1/5   OVERALL 3/20
gatsby15 (16) - Charlottesville, Virginia, USA - DEC 24, 2004
I bought this for my non-beer geezer friends while I enjoyed a nice Fullers London Porter. They goaded me into tasting it because it is "the best beer ever." It tastes much like every other crappy American pale lager. A hint of bitterness and a a boatload of horrible pain

1.3
   AROMA 3/10   APPEARANCE 2/5   TASTE 3/10   PALATE 2/5   OVERALL 3/20
badgerben (5044) - Blaine, Minnesota, USA - DEC 6, 2004
Bottle. Smelled like water, looked like water, tasted like water with a bit of alcohol splashed in it.

3.5
   AROMA 5/10   APPEARANCE 4/5   TASTE 8/10   PALATE 5/5   OVERALL 13/20
REDDOGICE (243) - nantucket, Massachusetts, USA - JUL 7, 2004
UPDATED: APR 18, 2005 Not bad at all, In fact, I kind of like it.

1
   AROMA 1/10   APPEARANCE 1/5   TASTE 1/10   PALATE 1/5   OVERALL 6/20
robertsreality (2460) - Minnesota, USA - JUN 14, 2004
Personally....no difference for me between Michs....why do people love this ?

4.6
   AROMA 9/10   APPEARANCE 4/5   TASTE 10/10   PALATE 4/5   OVERALL 19/20
Jayson2425 (167) - Box Elder, South Dakota, USA - APR 10, 2004
UPDATED: APR 14, 2004 Very refreshing beer that goes down easy and has a good flavor. I like to drink it out of a nice cold tall glass


We Want To Hear From You



Join us! RateBeer is made by beer enthusiasts for the craft beer community. Your basic membership is free and allows you to read all beer ratings. Click here to create your account... and give your opinion!

Join Us »



Page  1 2 3 4 5 6  7  8 9 10 11 12 13
Tick this beer for your profile
  • Currently 0/5 Stars.
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5