overall
n/a
0
style
RATINGS: 1332   WEIGHTED AVG: 1.12/5   EST. CALORIES: 126   ABV: 4.2%
COMMERCIAL DESCRIPTION
Bottle: Filtered.
Ingredients: Pale two-row and Munich six-row barley, select grains, all imported hops and a pure cultured yeast strain.
Introduced in 2002.
Michelob Ultra, the new low-carb light beer with taste smooth enough to carry the Michelob name.

Tick this beer for your profile
  • Currently 0/5 Stars.
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5


jaseonem99's rating

0.5
jaseonem99 (19) - USA - OCT 18, 2002
not the worst beer I ever had, but very close


1.8
bunget (960) - Ottawa, Ontario, CANADA - JUN 20, 2017
Can. Pale yellow body, medium white head with minimal retention and no lacing. Aroma of grains, corn, wet cardboard, metallic can and hard candies. Taste of grains, faint herbs, corn and mineral water. Watery indeed.

1.5
csaso (2264) - Missouri, USA - JUN 3, 2017
Bottle - drank straight out of bottle, very basic pale aroma and flavor, fine for what it is I guess ---Rated via Beer Buddy for iPhone

0.6
beerhunter88 (1) - Maine, USA - JUN 3, 2017 does not count
This has to be the worst beer on the planet. If I had to choose between drinking a Michelob Ultra or drinking battery acid Iíd go for the acid every time. Ultra tastes like dishwater. Wanna get beat up in a bar? Order an Ultra and see how long it takes before you get punched out.

3.2
lsutke652 (3) - Louisiana, USA - MAY 23, 2017 does not count
Like the low calorie feel to it, but you know itís low calorie because it looks very light yellow and tastes a lot like water. Itís good that itís low calorie because you can drink 30 of them without feeling full.

1.3
Msdrbeat (773) - East Lansing, USA - MAY 19, 2017
Bottled. Light beer. Wheat. Not much hop character at all. Okay for a night. ---Rated via Beer Buddy for iPhone

1.3
Lacho (95) - USA - APR 23, 2017
On a low carb diet, no beers allowed. Saw the TV ads showing good looking people doing fit stuff and then having fun drinking this beer. Paid no attention. A friend recommended this beer on the fact that itís very low carb and drinking this would not screw my macros. So I tried it and even though itís a really bad beer, I could see myself not falling of the wagon because of a great stout or imperial IPA. This beer and itís amber cousin have kept me company for the last 3 weeks. Not an option when other beers are possible.

2.3
Drjohnrock (761) - Cincinnati, Ohio, USA - JAN 1, 2017
Twelve ounce bottle at my wifeís cousinís house on September 3, 2016. Color: couldnít be bothered to pour it into a glass. Iíll give it a 3 as a fudge factor. Aroma: something not to dwell on. Taste: starts out sweet, finishes slightly rancid, long unpleasant aftertaste. Not as bad as expected but not worth drinking again.

2.1
Ronritter (650) - Blaine, Minnesota, USA - DEC 21, 2016
Not as bad others of this ilk but still not something you should choose to drink.

1.5
DandyWolfFloyd (1202) - Jim Thorpe, Pennsylvania, USA - DEC 14, 2016
Aroma - has a small adjunct rice malt, mildest of hops. Appearance - clean pale. White head, that fades into a ring. Taste - light on hops, light on malt, just plain boring. Palate - light body, thin texture, lively carbonation, and neutral finish.

1.7
Ratman197 (14664) - Arvada, Colorado, USA - DEC 12, 2016
Bottle poured a clear pale yellow with a small lasting white head. Aromas of bread and water. Palate was light bodied and crisp. Flavors of bread and water with a crisp finish.


We Want To Hear From You



Join us! RateBeer is made by beer enthusiasts for the craft beer community. Your basic membership is free and allows you to read all beer ratings. Click here to create your account... and give your opinion!

Join Us »



Page    1  2 3 4 » 134
Tick this beer for your profile
  • Currently 0/5 Stars.
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5