getsomeplaya99 (19) - Waukegan, Illinois, USA - SEP 14, 2002
The Champagne of Beers. This beer has been around for over 100 years. The only things that bothers me about this beer is the price. What was Miller thinking about when they lowered the price on such a fine brew? This is a classic and will remain that way long after the Micro brews have faded away. gerdy555 (163) - Ohio, USA - SEP 8, 2002
not to bad for a budget beer. i usually fall back on this when i'm poor and want a tall can of something Turtboy (120) - Lucasville, Ohio, USA - SEP 7, 2002
I've seen a lot of guys knocking this beer...I come from a long line of beer drinkers who's motto is quanity rather than quality. Cheap, 5%ABV, how can you go wrong. metaldust (30) - Missouri, USA - SEP 6, 2002
A little better than Milwaukee's BEAST. A hell of alot better than MGD...... NeonLX (261) - Wisconsin, USA - SEP 5, 2002
Well, when someone hands you a free beer it's always polite to thank them and then drink it. I hadn't tasted Miller since back in my college days. It was no worse or better than I remembered it. No particular taste stands out; not very sweet nor bitter. I'd have to say it looks better than it tastes.
mwsf (360) - San Francisco, California, USA - SEP 5, 2002
Light yellow. Very fizzy. Extremely slight hop and malt aroma. Slight malt flavor. Slight hop flavor. No real bitterness. Not as bad as I had remembered although nothing stunning. papajijo (22) - USA - SEP 4, 2002
It truely is the champagne of beers. This brew is inexpensive, yet has an alcohol content that is comfortable to everyone. I choose this beer when I go to parties, because I'll prob. be the only person with it, and I can tell if someone is taking my beer. I highly recommend this brew. (plus this group of kids that call themselves the 'associates' think its a good brew, and they are the coolest **cough cough** bullshit) Dave420 (55) - O.C, California, USA - SEP 4, 2002
millwakees best in a bottle............................................ TheGreatKen (76) - San Diego, California, USA - AUG 31, 2002
Not bad for a cheap beer.............................................. drunkenman99 (6) - USA - AUG 29, 2002 does not count
For a mainstream beer this is a drinkable. Foul smelling IMHO, but looks decent and has an okay taste. I wouldn't buy it myself!