AxeMaster221 (343) - Portland, Oregon, USA - MAR 6, 2002
The first beer i ever had. Thought it was great at the time, now i think it sucks. Score reflects nostalgia value/ JoeM500 (1908) - Crown Point, Indiana, USA - MAR 3, 2002
It looks like beer. It sort of tastes like beer. I have a friend that swears by the stuff, so at his barbeques I must suck it up and do the Champagne of Beers. O-well. bighair (51) - Hamilton, Ohio, USA - MAR 3, 2002
champagne of beer? more like the wine-in-a-box of beer. Dragonblaze99 (353) - Greater London, ENGLAND - MAR 2, 2002
It looks like beer, but it sure does NOT taste like beer. Skunky, tasteless, overly metallic (that can be from the can, though). A waste of time. Cutlass (51) - Galloway, Ohio, USA - MAR 2, 2002
probably the best cheap beer out there; i wouldnt be disappointed if someone handed me one. nothing offensive about this beer at all.
Skrip99 (82) - Los Angeles, California, USA - MAR 1, 2002
Was a great beer waaay back when. Too bad people are buying all that ’tough man’ advertising B/S. This beer sucks and it’s what I see bums outside the liquor store on the floor drinking (on a good panhandling day). It has a cheap beer taste, but somehow it doesn’t connect right. AKA Miller Low-Life. DeltaSigsWSU99 (9) - Pullman, Washington, USA - FEB 28, 2002 does not count
The commercials say it all.....I’m a High Life Man 5crown99 (9) - Maryland, USA - FEB 26, 2002 does not count
i like high life, its far better than anything from budweiser, coors, and much tastier than any other miller products. bottles do taste much better, but i usually keep a 30 pack of cans at the house. you can drink it with friends, and not feel bad about wasting alot of money. Big-D99 (10) - ellensburg, Washington, USA - FEB 26, 2002
damn, why did i waste my time with this crap! Shipman (48) - Spring City, Pennsylvania, USA - FEB 23, 2002
It is cheap! This is one of my favorite beers. Here at Shippensburg, we reward ourselves with good beer, and this is one of those beers.