RATINGS: 2385   WEIGHTED AVG: 1.4/5   EST. CALORIES: 126   ABV: 4.2%
COMMERCIAL DESCRIPTION
This carefully crafted pilsner uses the finest ingredients and brewing techniques to ensure rich, full-bodied beer taste at only 96 calories.

Tick this beer for your profile
  • Currently 0/5 Stars.
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5


2.9
   AROMA 5/10   APPEARANCE 3/5   TASTE 8/10   PALATE 3/5   OVERALL 10/20
papajijo (22) - USA - SEP 4, 2002
this is the beer that i started drinking with. i cannot thank miller enough for this. the taste of this beer is irrelavent to me because it has sentimental meaning to me. but i think the taste is good for an American beer.....keep on drinking

1.1
   AROMA 2/10   APPEARANCE 2/5   TASTE 2/10   PALATE 2/5   OVERALL 3/20
SiddFinch (155) - Pen Argyl, Pennsylvania, USA - SEP 3, 2002
Had this at a picnic yesterday. Worse of the three American Lights. This has an aftertaste that reminds me each sip, exactly what Im drinking.

1.6
   AROMA 3/10   APPEARANCE 2/5   TASTE 3/10   PALATE 2/5   OVERALL 6/20
BillKismet (3989) - Seattle, Washington, USA - SEP 2, 2002
Very carbonated, light gold, and with a fluff head that collapses like the Anaheim Angels every September. In my mind, this beer vacillates between Am. standard and Am. light as far as mouthfeel and heaviness are concerned--but it is probably not worth quibbling over the difference between light and ultra light. Finishes with a flat, cardboard feel on the palate--at least this beer is clean and crisp.

1.5
   AROMA 2/10   APPEARANCE 2/5   TASTE 3/10   PALATE 2/5   OVERALL 6/20
IneedAbuheer (69) - Ingleside, Illinois, USA - SEP 2, 2002
Not much of any flavor to talk about - useful when youre looking for quantity, not quality. For the battle of the U.S. macrobrews, I give my nod to Bud.

1.6
   AROMA 3/10   APPEARANCE 2/5   TASTE 5/10   PALATE 2/5   OVERALL 4/20
Nuffield (4130) - Roseville, Minnesota, USA - AUG 31, 2002
UPDATED: MAR 7, 2003 My friend was drinking this, so I partook. Terrible. No flavor, like water, and just really awful. Re-rate: I had a can at a fish fry and it was very thin, I could see to the bottom of the can after opening it! White head, but actually not an offensive flavor, sort of like MGD made palatable.

0.5
   AROMA 1/10   APPEARANCE 1/5   TASTE 1/10   PALATE 1/5   OVERALL 1/20
007lund (92) - Ann Arbor, USA - AUG 28, 2002
Might quite possibly be the worst beer Ive ever had. Almost water, with a very weak taste. The only thing its got going for it is the fantastic marketing. I wouldnt offer this to guests unless their sole purpose was to slam back beers until they passed out, and thats only because the stuffs not expensive.

1
   AROMA 2/10   APPEARANCE 1/5   TASTE 2/10   PALATE 1/5   OVERALL 4/20
jcalbi (380) - Medford, New Jersey, USA - AUG 26, 2002
Vintage dated Super Bowl XXXII (1998?). Clearing out the fridge before the move. Rancid foamy crap. Guess I missed the best before date by about 36 MONTHS!!!

1.3
   AROMA 2/10   APPEARANCE 1/5   TASTE 2/10   PALATE 1/5   OVERALL 7/20
ToadMan (559) - Washington, Washington DC, USA - AUG 23, 2002
Very watery, not much flavor at all. But nothing offensive, cheap, and it gets you drunk.

2.3
   AROMA 3/10   APPEARANCE 2/5   TASTE 7/10   PALATE 3/5   OVERALL 8/20
TMP8899 (6) - Hattiesburg, Mississippi, USA - AUG 22, 2002 does not count
Much better than budlight or coors light. Best light beer available.

2.6
   AROMA 5/10   APPEARANCE 3/5   TASTE 5/10   PALATE 3/5   OVERALL 10/20
Ringo (963) - Loveland, Colorado, USA - AUG 22, 2002
Re-rate. I was unfair to this the first time, I must have been in a critical mood. Its no worse than Bud. I like it cold in the can with fried chicken. What can I say.


We Want To Hear From You



Join us! RateBeer is made by beer enthusiasts for the craft beer community. Your basic membership is free and allows you to read all beer ratings. Click here to create your account... and give your opinion!

Join Us »



Page  1 « 208 209 210  211  212 213 214 » 239
Tick this beer for your profile
  • Currently 0/5 Stars.
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5