RATINGS: 2390   WEIGHTED AVG: 1.41/5   EST. CALORIES: 126   ABV: 4.2%
COMMERCIAL DESCRIPTION
This carefully crafted pilsner uses the finest ingredients and brewing techniques to ensure rich, full-bodied beer taste at only 96 calories.

Tick this beer for your profile
  • Currently 0/5 Stars.
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5


1.6
Nuffield (4167) - Roseville, Minnesota, USA - AUG 31, 2002
UPDATED: MAR 7, 2003 My friend was drinking this, so I partook. Terrible. No flavor, like water, and just really awful. Re-rate: I had a can at a fish fry and it was very thin, I could see to the bottom of the can after opening it! White head, but actually not an offensive flavor, sort of like MGD made palatable.

0.5
007lund (92) - Ann Arbor, USA - AUG 28, 2002
Might quite possibly be the worst beer I’ve ever had. Almost water, with a very weak taste. The only thing it’s got going for it is the fantastic marketing. I wouldn’t offer this to guests unless their sole purpose was to slam back beers until they passed out, and that’s only because the stuff’s not expensive.

1
jcalbi (380) - Medford, New Jersey, USA - AUG 26, 2002
Vintage dated Super Bowl XXXII (1998?). Clearing out the fridge before the move. Rancid foamy crap. Guess I missed the best before date by about 36 MONTHS!!!

1.3
ToadMan (559) - Washington, Washington DC, USA - AUG 23, 2002
Very watery, not much flavor at all. But nothing offensive, cheap, and it gets you drunk.

2.3
TMP8899 (6) - Hattiesburg, Mississippi, USA - AUG 22, 2002 does not count
Much better than budlight or coors light. Best light beer available.

2.6
Ringo (963) - Loveland, Colorado, USA - AUG 22, 2002
Re-rate. I was unfair to this the first time, I must have been in a critical mood. It’s no worse than Bud. I like it cold in the can with fried chicken. What can I say.

2.1
popilius (61) - Chicagoland, Illinois, USA - AUG 20, 2002
UPDATED: NOV 22, 2003 I tried this on tap in downtown Milwaukee, and it was so fresh and tasted far better than I ever tasted it. They must have just milked the cow. It almost doesn't count unless it's very fresh.

0.6
estoppel (1028) - Buffalo, New York, USA - AUG 18, 2002
Earns a point for being better than Coors Light.

1.1
ddipaolo (26) - USA - AUG 17, 2002
When I drink with friends who insist on the cheap macrobrews, I generally end up drinking this. Not very good at all, but easy to get a lot down fast at which point you begin to forget how bad it tastes.

1
Panzuriel (2199) - Westerville, Ohio, USA - AUG 17, 2002
Every one of these Macro brews has a distinctly different taste if you can find it. This one tastes oddly like cardboard.


We Want To Hear From You



Join us! RateBeer is made by beer enthusiasts for the craft beer community. Your basic membership is free and allows you to read all beer ratings. Click here to create your account... and give your opinion!

Join Us »



Page  1 « 209 210 211  212  213 214 215 » 239
Tick this beer for your profile
  • Currently 0/5 Stars.
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5