RATINGS: 2188   WEIGHTED AVG: 1.41/5   EST. CALORIES: 126   ABV: 4.2%
COMMERCIAL DESCRIPTION
This carefully crafted pilsner uses the finest ingredients and brewing techniques to ensure rich, full-bodied beer taste at only 96 calories.

A tick is a star rating
  • Currently 0/5 Stars.
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5


DrnkMcDermott's rating

1.5
   AROMA 3/10   APPEARANCE 4/5   TASTE 2/10   PALATE 2/5   OVERALL 4/20
DrnkMcDermott (3159) - Downers Grove, Illinois, USA - JUN 9, 2003
Aroma? None. Flavor? Not bad, cause there is none. I have to give it points for looking like a beer. Was served this by someone who still thinks beer tastes best in a glass that's been in the freezer. Tried to get him interested in a Yuengling I'd bought, but no dice.


2
larrynyc1 (1) - New York, USA - DEC 9, 2017 does not count
UPDATED: DEC 9, 2017 Oh god this horse piss. But served ice cold in a frosted pint glass and it’s tolerable

2.1
BeerBenji (19) - - DEC 2, 2017
Really good for a lite macro lager. The price isn't the best in the world but it's certainly not expensive either. In the middle on this beer. Has a very crisp finish. The light part of it is what makes it not the best macro lager. ---Rated via Beer Buddy for iPhone

1.8
nohopspleez (84) - Georgia, USA - NOV 9, 2017
I used to love this beer. So good on a hot summer day, since it was so light.
Today??? Not so much.

Where is the taste? The flavor??? The "BEERiness"??

if you are watching calories, sure, drink it.

if you want beer, try a German brew. Any of them.

1.5
ChrisOfstad (362) - Hamar, NORWAY - NOV 6, 2017
UPDATED: NOV 6, 2017 From backlog, on draft. Light yellow with little white head. Not much aroma or taste.

1.8
StoutBeerReviews (257) - Kenosha, Wisconsin, USA - OCT 5, 2017
fine. a bit pricey for what it is but its fine. stable beer of the united states, i looks cool

1.8
badhack (571) - San Francisco, California, USA - SEP 2, 2017
Incredibly lite, corn flavor is not too apparent, a very moderate malt character. Not much hops. Flavor+hops is still less than a Mexican lager. It's very light and low alcohol to say the least.

0.7
freekyp (2428) - Thomasville, North Carolina, USA - AUG 29, 2017
Tap version. Absolutely vile. Sickly plastic bag aroma and flavor. No corn, no hops, no malt, just plastic garbage bag. Thin. Small white head with no retention. Both aroma and flavor are gross. I gave it a 2 overall, because at least it’s wet.

2.4
salvaticas (1002) - - AUG 26, 2017
Can pour. Surprisingly good aroma - hops and malt. Pours a golden amber. Flavor is almost nonexistent. Very slightly bitter. Light body. It is what it is.

4
bubblite (5) - - AUG 24, 2017 does not count
UPDATED: AUG 24, 2017 rate beer has it wrong...this is a pilsner. I find it to be the most drinkable light beer of them all. mich ultra would be next. less filling more taste is right. perfect amount of bitterness and very crisp.

1.4
Grumbo (4119) - Ipswich, Suffolk, ENGLAND - AUG 23, 2017
Bottle, in US. Backlog entry. Entering my historic scores for US beers whilst visiting New York. No tasting notes kept, just rating.


We Want To Hear From You



Join us! RateBeer is made by beer enthusiasts for the craft beer community. Your basic membership is free and allows you to read all beer ratings. Click here to create your account... and give your opinion!

Join Us »



Page    1  2 3 4 » 241
A tick is a star rating
  • Currently 0/5 Stars.
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5