overall
25
98
style
Formerly brewed at Millstream Brewing Company
Style: Pale Lager
Amana, Iowa USA

bottling
unknown

on tap
unknown

distribution
unknown

Add Distribution Data
RATINGS: 11   MEAN: 2.84/5.0   WEIGHTED AVG: 2.86/5   ABV: -
COMMERCIAL DESCRIPTION
Well-aged for a robust body and creamy head, Millstream Lager is a delight to the senses imparting an arousing aroma and satisfying flavor.

A tick is a star rating
  • Currently 0/5 Stars.
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5


3.1
gripweed57 (2918) - Hamilton Square, New Jersey, USA - MAY 18, 2017
From old tasting notes. Deep amber gold color. Bubbly yellowish head. Light grainy malt nose. Tangy malt flavor has a citrusy backdrop. Earthy malt/hop finish. Brisk dry aftertaste.m

2.6
drowland (9164) - Georgia, USA - AUG 25, 2009
Had this a couple of years ago, and it was nothing special, so no wonder they got rid of it. Fear not, they just brought back their crappy "pilsner" to replace it.

2.8
robertsreality (2460) - Minnesota, USA - DEC 25, 2006
Octoberfest Coloring with Sandy Head. Sweet Malty Aroma...Very Subtle.. Sweet Malt, with a Light Hoppy Background....Very Bitter Finish... On the Darker Side of Pale Lagers but Good Session Style.

3.2
wunderbier (1434) - Tampere, FINLAND - AUG 26, 2005
Thanks again heemer! Light ruby hue with a small, off-white head. Toasted dark bread, cereal, caramelized pale malt. Light herb hops. A little nutty with hints of butterscotch. Light sweetness thoughout with a crisp finishing bitterness. Acidity is a touch stronger than I’d like to be tasting. Above average carbonation is spot on; medium body with a watery, nearly creamy, texture.

2.9
JPDIPSO (6293) - Wauwatosa, USA - MAR 2, 2004
Light amber color with a moderate yellowish head. Some lace. Light pale malt and mild floral hops. A touch sharp and earthy in the finish. I do believe these brews maybe improving.

2.7
jde123 (775) - Washington, Washington DC, USA - FEB 20, 2004
Not too original yellowish haze, decent body, nice for an american lager. better then most actually. I would recommend it.

2.1
Strykzone (7721) - Wood River, Illinois, USA - DEC 18, 2003
Perhaps it is because lagers are so difficult to identify. This beer I found equally difficult to rate. My sense is that it was a disappointing beer by both flavor and aroma. The trouble is that neither are easy to determine why. Instead of making the effort, maybe I will just go get another brand of beer.

1.1
ARMed (625) - Garnet Valley, Pennsylvania, USA - DEC 13, 2003
Horrible brew. tart, tangy and undrinkable. This could be a bad batch but the beer was aweful!

3.9
mkobes (2142) - paramus, New Jersey, USA - NOV 25, 2003
Enjoyable brew. Creamy head. Complex in flavor. Hoppy and malty, Well balanced. A good brew.

3
Gusler (2652) - Tucson, Arizona, USA - AUG 5, 2002
A deep copper color, clear, the head is average, beige, the lace is also adequate. Nose is malt, the front sweet, the top is light, the finish is lightly carbonated, dry, and a fair hop presence, a bit thin in the end won't score many points with me. Ranks #864 on my current 1000 beer master list.


We Want To Hear From You



Join us! RateBeer is made by beer enthusiasts for the craft beer community. Your basic membership is free and allows you to read all beer ratings. Click here to create your account... and give your opinion!

Join Us »



Page    1  2
A tick is a star rating
  • Currently 0/5 Stars.
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5